• shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    219
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Clickbait headline. The underlying article lists much more reasonable restrictions:

    • Anonymous cash payments over €3,000 will be banned in commercial transactions
    • Cash payments over €10,000 will even be completely banned in business transactions
    • Anonymous payments in cryptocurrencies to wallets operated by providers will be prohibited

    So non-commercial transations are fine, as are crypto transactions to non-custodial wallets.

    • makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Commercial transactions -

      Aaah, the kind of transaction that most transactions are?

      Operated by providers

      Aah, so any business which accept crypto must KYC every one of their customers. This makes accepting crypto especially burdensome, which is half the point of this legislation in the first place.

      So non-commercial transations are fine, as are crypto transactions to non-custodial wallets.

      Unless you’re using the wallet to buy or sell something. You know, the thing people use money for.

      Why does the government need to have every transaction reported to them? Crime is bad because it causes harm. If harm is being caused, that means a person or entity is causing that harm. That means there is evidence. Follow that.

      Police have more surveillance and crime-detecting tools than at any point in human history. Nearly every category of crime, particularly violent crime, is on a decades-long downtrend. We all travel with GPS monitors in our pockets. We all use credit cards instead of cash. We all are recorded by CCTV 90% of the places we go. We don’t need to give them more financial surveillance because ‘crime’.

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’m not saying these rules are perfect, but it doesn’t help if you argue against rules that don’t exist.

        Commercial transactions are not “all” tx, and above 3000€ are obviously not the most common tx.

        I do think the crypto restriction with no lower limit is too much, and I don’t get why they focus on custodial wallets, but it’s again not “all” tx.

        Why does the government …

        Money laundering, tax evasion and corruption are real crimes with real consequences, and knowing about the flow of money is pretty much required to be able to detect them. It’s a trade-off with privacy, so imo setting some limit for anonymous payments is the right thing to do. Idk if 3000€ is perfect, but it does seem reasonable.

        Police have more surveillance and crime-detecting tools …

        We need some amount of oversight and surveillance, so imo it’s not good enough to just exaggerate every proposal to the extreme and reject it on those grounds. These rules are not a total crackdown on anonymous payments, but they might still be too restrictive. But you kill every discussion about that if you just make up different rules entirely, instead of arguing about the rules that were actually adopted.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        so any business which accept crypto must KYC every one of their customers

        No, any business must use a KYC custodian for their wallets. I don’t think they’ll need to KYC their customers, they’ll just need to account for those transactions in their accounting.

        So if the company accepts Monero, the Monero wallet would need to be with a custodian, but you’d be free to use Monero to buy stuff and remain anonymous. At least that’s my read.

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think they are used synonymously in this article, but business could also mean B2B transactions, so between two businesses.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unless you want to buy something with cash. Once they cross the line they won’t stop until cash and anonymity are gone

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, that’s my concern as well. However, most large cash purchases are things that are tracked anyway, like vehicles, houses, etc.

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    OP, your post is a mess.

    1. It’s not “total monetary surveillance,” it’s limited to cryptocurrency and high (>$11,000) cash payments.
    2. You shouldn’t encourage people to contact the EU before showing them what’s actually happening
    3. Your Snort post doesn’t work on my browser and it’s a pretty bad social network anyway.

    For people who are looking for actual info:

    https://www.dw.com/en/eu-seeks-cash-payment-limit-tougher-money-laundering-rules/a-68024075

    https://finbold.com/anonymous-crypto-wallets-now-illegal-in-the-eu/

    Or the source OP was using:

    https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-cash-cap-and-ban-on-anonymous-crypto-payments-results-in-financial-paternalism/

    (ETA better info and links)

    • naut@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      why would someone limit me how I can spend my earned and 40% already taxed (taken) money? I gave my life time to earn it, they take half of it and still forbidding me to use it?

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hiding money in anonymous crypto is a way to avoid paying taxes or launder money.

        Trump made crypto trading cards so Russia and Saudi Arabia could contribute to him anonymously.

        • naut@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          So if that is a problem, focus and investigate, why I have to do anything with that? And that is US, this is EU.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Corrupt politicians can simply ignore the law. If they didn’t ignore it, they wouldn’t be very corrupt.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Good point. My statement was a bit reductive, I just worry when it comes to creating the kind of blanket ban on stuff that people can work around if they’re powerful enough.

    • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Consumers payments deserves their privacy, but business ones needs absolutely to be fully traceable.

      Could it be possible to use two different yet identical interchangeable currencies, one traceable for making business only, and one untraceable for consumers retail transactions?

      loosely i.e.

      • wages are Business currency converted and paid in Consumer currency, accounted for the amount paid to the consumer in his name
      • end-users/home/consumer purchases are made from consumers anonymously in Consumer currency, and this is converted converted into Business currency upon transaction, keeping only the consumer name anonymous but tracing everything else
      • B2B transactions are made in Business currency, fully traceable

      … I don’t know there is probably still a loophole

    • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am pretty sure the lesser part of corruption is cash. Probably more stuff like exchanging a lucrative contract for political support.

      They are not stupid. Afterall cash needs to be explained, a good contract gives you cash and the explanation.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Cash is mostly traceable at point of contact unless you keep it in a money bin and don’t spend it, though…

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not necessarily, it’s only traceable if you generate receipts on both sides. I don’t know about EU law, but in the US, you only need to report cash deposits if they’re over $10k, and if your deposits are always over $10k (e.g. you’re a big retailer or something), another $10k here and there won’t raise any eyebrows.

          Cash is still king when it comes to corruption since it’s easy to exchange it for favors w/o generating a receipt at all.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The 500€ bill was removed from circulation because it was used almost exclusively for corruption and illegal trade.

    • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      After the Panama Papers and everything like it I’ve experienced in my life, I truly believe it doesn’t matter if very wealthy or powerful people are exposed on anything they do unless it involves what Epstein did. Financial crime is not generally of interest, regardless of how interesting it might be to you and me. Sure this can be used to fight corruption, but why is the system corrupt in the first place? Is this really going to be used against those corrupting influences or is it going to be used as another of the many tools in the drug war?

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The solution isn’t to do nothing. This post reads like it’s not in good faith. Like it’s trying to promote giving up.

        • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Of course. By suggesting that I don’t think this will do anything about corruption and will if anything be a tool used for corrupt purposes, I don’t mean to suggest that there is nothing to do about corruption. Even though I think the solutions to social and economic problems are rarely solved from the top down, I do think the issues can be addressed bottom up. The people have the power and it’s only by circumstance that some people appear to hold the power.

    • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Russia almost did it. Now it’s finally free of corruption!

      Haha , nope. It’s way more corrupt than before. You can even purchase on the dark web a list of items your person of interest bought this year.

    • naut@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      so ban it only for government (people and assets) related transactions

    • summerof69@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      True that. The system that we have is the product of many painful lessons, taught to us by global crises and crimes. People, who oppose this system, should stop reading nonsense on reddit and 4chan, and start with books and lectures from educated economists.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Putin’s corruption works fine without anonymous payments

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s literally what businesses do, it’s called accounting. And if you read the underlying article and/or law, you’d see that this is targeting businesses, not individuals.

      • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s a special status for some people in Russia, it’s called Foreign Agent, and I believe they need to write down everything they spend money on this way

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This doesn’t seem that much worse than American rules that have already been in place for a long, long time.

    As it is, large payments or withdrawals must be reported to federal agencies, anything over $10k. This applies to cash transactions as well and the forms the IRS requires you to fill in a $10k+ cash transaction can be found here.

    The biggest difference would be the impact on cash transactions and crypto transactions in the EU.

    I’m pro-privacy, but a lot more crypto facilitates crime than not, so I don’t really know why people would be shocked that governments would attack crypto specifically here (literally almost all ransomware uses crypto). Looks like way more of a crackdown on crypto than cash, but maybe that’s just me. (On top of the fact that a lot of crypto isn’t privacy-oriented. Looking at you, Bitcoin)

    Related: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/venmo-paypal-zelle-must-report-600-transactions-irs-rcna11260

    Two years ago USA put in rules for commercial digital transfers over $600 to be reported. Just pointing out that the EU’s rules don’t seem particularly draconian when weighed against already existing rules elsewhere.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This doesn’t seem that much worse than American rules that have already been in place for a long, long time.

      Do you really want to be like the US, though? I think maybe that’s not a great idea. (Source: am from US)

    • Juviz@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Here in Germany Cash payments for houses are a great way of laundering money for the mafia. Similar roles have als been proposed a while ago

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Still not a good enough reason to reduce the privacy and freedom of any citizen. I don’t care if the mob uses cash, let the police track the serial numbers of their cash if they catch them doing crimes or whatever. The mob isn’t my problem, but losing freedom is bad for every citizen.

        • Crow of Minerva@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The mob isn’t your problem unless you live in a society shaped heavily by them. In that case, this act has more pros than cons

      • AnagrammadiCodeina@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Italian here. Our right wing government who blinks an eye to all small entrepreneur in Italy (there are A TON here) recently increased the max cash payment from 2k to 5k. This is definitely a way to say “please be free to recycle a bit more oney” and to gain votes in exchange.

        It’s incredible how Germany, Austria, or Switzerland to name a few have this crazy high cash payment.

        In fact our “ndrangheta” for example (Mafia from Calabria) expanded a lot in Germany due to this.

  • Lowlee Kun@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    This thread is a dumpster fire. Can someone explain to me why i should be concerned about the tracking of payments that as an average person will not happen outside of buying huge stuff like a car? While no one is forced to answer me i would like you to refrain from vague statements like “this is attacking your privacy”, because i am interested in how. If you think its obvious feel free to ignore.

    I think the biggest point that i could see being a problem is the crypto stuff because i once made a anonymous donation via monero (that because i was concerned but the target needed privacy). It was about 30€ or something. Would that be illegal under the new guidelines? And if so, why would i care, since it is supposed to be anonymous.

    • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Anonymity is important for various reasons. You can’t predict everything bad a government will try to do to stifle freedom that a person may want to avoid. Off the top of my head, I could see someone trying to pay for an abortion or something like that in a southern state where it’s illegal, for health reasons to save their own life.

      • Lowlee Kun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think this is actually a very good example, thank you.

        People from europe sometimes come a long as assholes (“wE aRe NoT iN tHe ShItTy UsA”) while ignoring that political stability is not guaranteed. Neither is democracy. Sitting here germany i look very nervously at the many countries shifting to the right and getting more authoritarian.

        I pray to all gods that the times we live in wont be very interesting for historians to come…

        • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I think that’s a big reason I’m so pro-privacy. I’m sure if the US weren’t a couple steps ahead of you guys towards fascism, I’d prioritize other things, too. Hopefully you all can stop the march towards the right of your government before it gets worse.

    • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      To me the problem is that you wouldn’t be able to buy a car anonymously anymore, while it leaves the really rich pretty much untouched.

      Art is a well known angle for money laundering or giving someone a huge sum of money pretty much without any regulation. Contracts for construction or even consulting are another way.

      I don’t have access to this kind of playground - chances are, you neither. But the people supposedly targeted by this kind of law (corrupt politicians, organised crime, …), do have access to these things and are therefore not impacted.

        • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          nothing to hide nothing to fear, huh?

          And i thought at least after Snowden we learnt this is bs…

          • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            What a sophilistic reply. No, car insurance is a thing. The purchase will no longer be anonymous, after you purchase car insurance for the car you just bought.

            “You know, for all those totally, 100% legitimate and completely anonymous car purchases people make, that definitely won’t be used by organised crime: honest.”

    • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      I use Monero for donations too on a regular basis. From what I understand, the people accepting donations would no longer be allowed to sell them to professional platforms (silly as those are the ones KYCing).

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think they would be. If they’re operating as a business, the requirement is that their wallet(s) is at a custodian, so all transactions can be audited. You could still donate to that charity, and that charity would still be able to sell them or use them to buy stuff from another entity, but there would be a paper trail for the charity and the businesses they interact with. It doesn’t impact the person donating, only the receiver.

    • Safipok@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Let’s say you have political beliefs and would like to donate to such causes, March against genocide, stand with local essential workers, union fee. Some places like Hungary might be very dangerous if everyone knows what you spend money on.

    • mea_rah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Depending how inflation goes €3k limit will soon be in the territory of regular smartphone price or any slightly more expensive household purchase. AFAIK €1k 3 decades ago would be about €3k now.

      That is assuming no one tries to push the limits lower, which is almost guaranteed to happen.

    • pelicans_plight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well I’m not in the EU, but in my situation I live in a shithole in the US called Tennessee. I have cancer that can be removed, but I don’t have the quarter of a million for the surgery. It’s been impossible to get a surgeon to even look at me, 2 years looking and still no surgeons will even let me in their office.

      I need medications but the med I need the most is $8000 a month, it suppresses my autoimmune system and alows me to heal. My cancer is vary rare, it’s called a neuroendocrine tumor, it’s caused by extreme stress, this is because I’m a natural born empath, but saying that out loud usually gets a knife in my back from anyone near me carrying dark energy.

      But to get to the point, I can get some meds occasionally for cheap, as long as they’re sold for cash, but if that gos away then I definitely will die much faster. Seems on par for the life I’ve lived, care about everyone, then have everyone try to kill me.

      • Lowlee Kun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah i have heard about crypto being used to get cheaper medication, but i had forgotten, so thanks for taking your time and sharing this example.

        I wish you the best health possible, better and cheaper medications and people that make your life better

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        So, because the US can’t get its shit together and you can’t get medical help for neither cancer nor psychological issues, the EU - with pretty good universal healthcare - should allow cash payments without limit?

          • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            For a supposed empath you act remarkably similar to an ahole.

            You’re describing a problem that literally does not exist in the EU to justify that a law in the EU is wrong. That’s not very smart.

            I wouldn’t argue for tougher gun laws in Germany because you guys keep getting your children shot either.

            • pelicans_plight@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s actually one of my karmic debts I must pay off (arrogance,) but I already paid off 8 karmic debts, only four more to go if I live to 98 like most in my family.

              I was probably a very bad person in my last life. That’s why this is my road this time, I except my cancer, and if it takes me then so be it. I also apologize for thinking of everyone as one and everyones actions actually effecting everyone else regardless of country, I forget so many people are still so programmed with tribalism.

              Also, if it helps you to understand, I grew up in an extremely conservative stronghold with rich assholes everywhere so I became a dark empath, found my way back mostly, but the dark still pounces out on someone now and then (I’m working on it.) Life’s a journey and some don’t want to even try to figure it out, but when you really really want to it starts to show you what you need to get where you need to be.

              Life has actually been better then ever since the cancer, I still have a projected seven years left, so I’m working on turning the money machine back on and making the money to save myself in this shitty country I live in, but I never expect anyone to understand what it’s like to feel others emotions your whole life in a family and community that refuse to except this stuff exists.

                • borari@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  that’s exactly what i’d expect a dark empath to say. sheathe your knife unless you want to get saddled with karmic debt bro. you’re limited to paying off karmic debt in transactions of no more than 3k eurohms each, and with this dark energy you’d be in karmic debt into the millions.

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      There isn’t really. Most people are unaware that most crash transactions and withdrawals anywhere close to those amounts will almost always have to be reported to the government of whatever country you’re in. But, you know, EU bad…

      There’s no wholesome reason to need 10k in cash. Even the examples here of paying for an abortion is a problem with reproductive freedom and not cash. You’re not suddenly going to get away with it because you “sneakily” withdrew 10s of 000s in cash, right before you travelled to a state where abortion was legal. Political donations can be made in small, repeated sums. Specifically, as they dont sell large value items.

      Unless you’re a hired assassin, a paedophile network, a corrupt politican or a drug cartel it’s not going to effect your business.

      In reality, most of the nay sayers are people who take cash payments for the work they do to avoid paying the taxes the rest of us have to pay, for the things we all use.

    • LemmyHead@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago
      • tacking of payments gives those in power (banks, [bad] governments,…) Mechanism to completely profile and manipulate you. Your spendings says EVERYTHING about you. You might not care because you’re living in peaceful and stable (e.g. not in economic crisis like Venezuela) times, but the world and many governments are visibly changing for the worst. It gives them unlimited power to introduce any kind of taxes and fines or means of blocking you from moving away with your money to somewhere else. You don’t agree? They can still get to your money.
      • limiting cash or anynomous payments takes away your financial freedom and strongly increases your dependency on banks. Banks put limits on your money that you can’t fully control, they block your transactions for whatever they find suspicous. They can charge you whatever they want. There’s a lot of corruption and money laundering with banks, that are the the most regulated institutions in the world ( except for armies probably), proving that even with a lot of control and legislation, those in power can still do whatever the fuck they want. Banks also take risks with your money and there have been crisises caused by them before. Most of them invest in oil, war and other ventures that are profitable for them. They manipulate markets for profit and for the worse of the common man. There’s a lot you can read about those things. Becoming so strongly dependant on banks give governments limitless power on what to do with your money and block it whenever they want. Truckers protested against government in Canada => bank accounts blocked.

      Whether or not some or all of these examples matter to you, one thing you have to understand and always defend is: you are the boss of your of money. Your ownership and control over your money is evenly linked to how much freedom you have.

      Another thing you also have to understand, even if you think full visibility and control for governments is a good thing to solve crime, corruption and/or money laundering: there are and have ALWAYS been black markets. And the worse countries are off, the stronger these markets become.

      • monsdar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Isn’t a simple solution to split the purchase then? I will buy the tires for 8000€ and the rest of the car for 9000€.

        I know this is nitpicking and they’re not doing this for cases like the above. People targeted by this will have other simple solutions to work around it.

      • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        More than 97% of monero buyers are in profit right now. Nobody on earth lost more than 10% buying monero

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do you see the irony of people treating a cryptocurrency in name as a cryptostock in reality?

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Monero is like an unregulated stock. If you want to use it for a purchase, you want to wait until as late as possible to actually purchase any.

      A better strategy for staying private would just be hoarding money under your bed.

      • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah but it’s hard to get hard money like gold coins or silver. Holding currency isn’t an option

  • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think people should create new and stronger communities to fight stuff like that

    Topics, groups, etc, where people discuss and organize system fighting

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    all Im thinking of is how payment processors have been acting as legislators lately to outlaw porn.