Hello, I wanna know which distro could be could for productivity (not gaming). Maybe a debian based one, I don’t know and I don’t care about the desktop env. Thx!
This is gonna be super far fetch, but hear me out… Debian…
THX
This gave me a good laugh
There’s so many distro’s to choose from that can all be productive.
If the question is this short, my answer is too: Go try at least 10 and then come back to tell us what you liked and what not.
Without any further information it’s like going into a forest and asking people to point out a tree. Unless you look for some specific tree all will do…
Edit: Fat fingers
Linux mint Debian edition or Opensuse tumbleweed.
Slow Internet/less updates, older, more tested software, slightly wider package availability: LMDE.
Faster Internet, more updates, very new (but well tested) software, needs slightly more technical knowledge sometimes: Opensuse tumbleweed.
I personally use Opensuse Slowroll, which is a slower rolling release experimental version of Opensuse tumbleweed.
Ok thx
+1 for debian.
No need to mess around with debian derivatives for whatever pointless extra widgets they have.
It’s good enough for most stuff and has “allow nonfree drivers” choice which helps with annoying hardware problems of the past.If you don’t care about desktop env, you probably don’t care about wayland vs xorg either.
So I’d try XFCE, simple, basic, lightweight, fast, probably not the most modern or flashy,
but you’re getting to work faster.Throw a dart and use whatever it lands on. If you don’t have any actual requirements, they’re all pretty okay.
Pretty much any distribution would meet that criteria.
Is just pick one and get going. If you run into problems, you’ll now have more specific selection criteria and can make a more discerning choice of another distribution.
Given your initial “maybe Debian” just grab Debian stable and see where it takes you.
Linux Mint EDGE
You can use almost any distribution for productivity. First, what type of productivity are we speaking off? Secondly your hardware. Do you need the newest of the newest or are you one who want to stay at the same known version of operating system for as long as possible?
All kinds of productivity, office to programming. And I’m on AMD platform + I don’t care about the newest, but want to have something maintained
Try Distrochooser: https://distrochooser.de/en/
Just to see what it gives to you and think and discuss about the suggestions.
I got Void Linux, which is exactly what I use. Neat.
(and Artix which I used before switching to Void)
Lol, top answer is Void LInux for me too. I’m not sure if they are weighted and if the top most is the best recommendation for me. I’m an EndeavourOS user and that is not suggested unfortunately. But Artix is second for me too. Maybe I should look closer to Void LInux too. I wouldn’t change, just curious now. Maybe I’ll test it in a virtual machine. :-)
Edit: BTW I did not click the option to avoid systemd. In fact, I don’t mind systemd.
Can u explain me systemd?
systemd is a big collection of software to manage the system. In example to start services or commands to shutdown the pc. The problem for many is, that this one big collection of software is developed by people from a giant company who already has lot of other stuff in most LInux systems integrated. The argumentation is that this company has much power over the system. There are arguments for and against it and I don’t want to get too much into it. Therefore some people create alternative versions of distibutions without these services they call bloat.
In short people don’t like it either because of bloat or because it’s all one giant collection of software or because the developers also work for Red Hat. There are maybe other reasons, but that is what I read mostly in forums/social media.
Here bunch of links you can read if you want.
-
- QA on Linode, 2. manpage, 3. Wikipedia, 4. Debian Wiki, 5. Arch Wiki, 6. Gentoo Wiki
-
deleted by creator
I’m a long time Mint user. My Mint laptop is my daily drive and it served me well even with my not IT related job during the pandemic home office days.
And it’s a 2nd gen i5 with 8 gb memory, it handled like a champ for 3d mechanical design.
I disagree with Debian because it has old packages and you will constantly have issues that are already fixed in the new versions. Specially if you run Plasma desktop or anything where lots of bugs are fixed constantly.
I think you will not have a great experience with Debian to be honest, but that being said, I have only ran it once for a few weeks. It was very frustrating for me to not have modern versions of software.
One guy below in the comments says he is happy with Gnome 43 which was released 18 months ago I believe. That’s what I’m talking about. You will lack almost two years of new features, bug fixes and improvements.
All this because people believe it’s more stable. But it’s not more stable at all, it’s just old already fixed bugs instead of new bugs.
You can get more updated packages by running debian testing, which is quite stable. Debian also is more stable. Security patches are still brought to the main release, making it secure. The stability comes from the lack of a lot of new updates which come with a lot of new bugs.
i cant say enough about mint. its handled all the nonsense ive thrown at it and then some.
Mint is my go to desktop option. It usually does the job.
I don’t usually worry about older packages. Most things run fine. I don’t spend a lot of time trying to make my UI pretty. For me, the GUI is a place for terminals, web browsers, my IDE, and general tools, not some kind of whiz bang thing to tweak all the time.
Debian: good enough and stable. No worries > new features.
Use Debian or whatever your organization will support.
Pretty much anything stable and mainstream. Think Pop os, Fedora or Linux Mint
