simple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSid Meier’s Civilization VII - Official Teaser Trailerwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1207arrow-down111file-textcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkSid Meier’s Civilization VII - Official Teaser Trailerwww.youtube.comsimple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square61fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down3·1 year agoBetween 4, 5 and 6, I don’t even know if I want another Civ game. I usually just play 4, despite having 1-6. 4 is like the peak of the series.
minus-squaredjsaskdja@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down2·1 year agoI’m glad they moved away from unit death stacks in 5 and 6. I think 5 has the best art direction, but 6 is peak gameplay for me.
minus-squareChailles@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoArmies in 5 and 6 are kind of underwhelming. Maybe a compromise of having terrain have unit capacities, with various units taking up more space.
minus-squareA_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-21 year agoYep. 5 was okay and different, but was definitely the start of the downward spiral. 4 is the best of what civlization has to offer. 4 was also great in that it got two expansions instead of 150 million tiny DLC for insane prices.
minus-squaremox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoI thought 5 was quite good with the Brave New World expansion/rework.
minus-square🇸🇵🇪🇨🇺🇱🇦🇹🇪🇷@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoI strongly prefer 5 to 6, 6 always felt like it was designed to be played on a tablet.
Between 4, 5 and 6, I don’t even know if I want another Civ game. I usually just play 4, despite having 1-6. 4 is like the peak of the series.
I’m glad they moved away from unit death stacks in 5 and 6. I think 5 has the best art direction, but 6 is peak gameplay for me.
Armies in 5 and 6 are kind of underwhelming. Maybe a compromise of having terrain have unit capacities, with various units taking up more space.
Yep.
5 was okay and different, but was definitely the start of the downward spiral.
4 is the best of what civlization has to offer.
4 was also great in that it got two expansions
instead of 150 million tiny DLC for insane prices.
I thought 5 was quite good with the Brave New World expansion/rework.
I strongly prefer 5 to 6, 6 always felt like it was designed to be played on a tablet.