I’m using EndeavourOS with KDE.

The display is correctly oriented when logged in but it doesn’t rotate correctly when I’m logged out.

EDIT: corrected the post. This happens when logged out, locking the screen has it displayed correctly.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh, I didn’t know that button existed. Great! Even though I just tried it and it didn’t apply my rotation settings correctly.

          • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Correct. Unfortunately, it’s something that each desktop environment or window manager has to implement themselves. But all the button is doing is moving some config files around, so you can probably do some digging to figure out what it’s copying to where.

            • Arkhive (they/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah, I’ve largely figured out how to change all these settings from configs for myself, just always on the lookout for a nice gui. I’m slowly working to make a Linux experience I can install for my relatives that makes the transition from crapware Windows relatively painless.

          • Astongt615@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            XDG_SESSION_THEME=KDE got my hyprland config to work on everything except the cursor (other than in Firefox/steam for some reason). Took me way too long to find the old reddit post that had this tip, so I hope it helps!

    • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This is why X11 is better. I’d rather have settings like this in a text file that I can copy over to my next machine than have to navigate a UI that will change on a different DE or the next upgrade.

      Backwards compatibility, portability, and text-based interfaces are a virtue.

      X config files aren’t “hacky scripts”, they are fundamentally more powerful, customizable, usable, and future-proof. Xrandr is a powerful and capable interface with applications across the system.

      When Wayland adopts these kinds of powerful interfaces with decades of refinement I’ll switch to it. I don’t want to keep track of whether my DE uses wlroots or gnome or plasma and their independent/redundant/feature-lacking randr alternatives. Randrs should be more fundamental to the display operation than the DE. Wayland is fundamentally hacky and broken.

      Edit: thank you all for the discussion. I’d like to clarify a point. I don’t just want a text file with configuration settings that implement features that I need to beg/bother the devs for. They are likely to have better things to do and it might not be a priority for them. I want access to powerful tools via the configuration files that I can make do pretty much anything if I read the documentation. Xrandr is such a tool. I don’t want setting for a feature that has to be baked into the DE which I have to beg to have implemented and which will be implemented differently across different DEs. I want flexible, dynamic, modular tools.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah that difference in configuration definitely makes it so much better, it completely outweighs the fact that Wayland does proper multi-monitor VRR, fractional scaling, HDR and much more.

        • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve never needed any of those things.

          I do need to change monitor configurations.

          I once had an old TV that I used as a monitor that had 1027p worth of pixels instead of 1080p. Auto detection tools said it was 1080p. With xrandr I was able to modify the output to 1027p so I didn’t lose the edges of the display to the TV’s broken forced overscan design. Could you do that with Wayland?

          • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Literally yes. And you don’t even need to know the exact pixel resolution of the TV.

            Edit: Here are the problems with you “Wayland isn’t good enough” people.

            First, you don’t use Wayland, so you don’t even know if it’s fixed whatever weird issue you encountered with it before or if it supports a niche use case, for example.

            Second, Wayland won’t get good enough for you until you start using it and reporting bugs. You think X11 was a bed of roses when it first started? Or do you think they bumped the version number 11 times for fun?

            • doona@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              First, you don’t use Wayland, so you don’t even know if it’s fixed whatever weird issue you encountered with it before or if it supports a niche use case, for example.

              Bingo. So many complaints I’ve seen about Wayland have been from Nvidia users who tried it three years ago when the driver support was beyond fucked. I get Linux development moves slow sometimes but holy shit…

            • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Good to know that this has been implemented in your favorite DE! Considering how Wayland often implements things, it’s probably implemented on the DE-level, leading to a fractured configuration ecosystem. Being implemented in Wayland is different from being implemented in some of the DEs that use Wayland.

              edit: if I’m wrong about that, and it is implemented in Wayland itself, please continue to correct me!

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You can’t be this stupid, Wayland also uses a config file, you just have a GUI button to copy the configs from inside your session to the login screen. Or do you think the button recompiles the login screen with a different configuration?

        • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I am serious, and I’ll tell you exactly what will change my mind. I need real tools instead of “upgrades” that have less functionality and are less usable. If Wayland (or whatever comes next) can deliver on functionality, I’ll sing its praises. For now I’m on X.

      • 30p87@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I never configured anything on X with a DE, let it be KDE, Gnome or Cosmic, but configure everything with config files I can just copy on sway. It has nothing to do with X or Wayland, but the DE/WM you use.

        • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s kind of my point. Something like randr is more fundamental than the DE, and its configuration shouldn’t be fractured by being DE-dependent. I personally don’t like DEs at all, and like the ability to control a more minimal system.

  • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Rotate the left display 90 degrees clockwise. Now they’re both in landscape. Ta-da!

    Sorry, I’ll see myself out.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Put one hand on the top and one on bottom and rotate the screen by 90° or π/2 radians

  • ta00000 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    On the arch wiki for SSDM I found this:

    Changes to your display configuration made in a Plasma Wayland session (e.g. monitor layout, resolution, etc) will not persist to SDDM. To make them persist open Plasma’s System Settings and navigate to Startup and Shutdown> Login Screen (SDDM) and click “Apply Plasma Settings…”. You will need to have permission to perform this action.

    You should give that a try

  • ClemaX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    From Archwiki > xrandr:

    Tip: Both GDM and SDDM have startup scripts that are executed when X is initiated. For GDM, these are in /etc/gdm/, while for SDDM this is done at /usr/share/sddm/scripts/Xsetup. This method requires root access and mucking around in system configuration files, but will take effect earlier in the startup process than using xprofile.

      • Klara@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        SDDM is still X11 based, no matter which desktop you run with it. I have tried enabling Wayland on it, but it’s been… Unstable to say the least.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is this when the screen is locked or when you’re logged out? Those are two different things and I suspect it’s the latter. That’s probably sddm and I suspect it can be fixed by using Wayland with it. Should be some option in /etc/sddm.conf or so.

    • governorkeagan@lemdro.idOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I corrected the post, thanks for calling it out! It’s fine when locked but the issue happens when logged out.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    usually monitors can be freely rotated. if yours can’t, the back usually has a square vesa mount on the back and you can just take out the four screws and reattach it the way you like.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Your screen on the left appears to be rotated vertically, rotate it 90 degrees clockwise and it should be better.

  • ta00000 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’ve just been logging in upside down for a couple years. My monitor’s vesa Mount is like 3 inches from the top for some reason so having it upside down is the only way I can get a reasonable ergonomic height

    Which display manager are you using?