So far Lemmy is vibing. Everyone here is excited and optimistic and willing to put up with a few rough spots to be part of something.

When the Eternal September comes, which it will, how does a Lemmy instance deal with bad actors?

  • bobaduk@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Agreed on all points! It turns out Lemmy has a mechanism for federating block lists. What will be interesting is when instances disagree about bans. If you get banned from an instance because - hypothetically - you disagree with the actions of one government or another, it’s not obvious to me that other instances should repeat the ban.

    Will we end up with islands of trust?

    • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yes, as we always do, digital systems should represent the real world, not be a distortion of it. Protocols are meant to standardize communication but the rights to re-distribution have never been guaranteed . Now many understand why this may not even be feasible in a real way.

      There will never be just “one zone” and there shouldn’t be, however control over your interaction with these zones should be up to you not brokered by a proxy. To a degree we do this out of necessity though IMO the larger goal would be to give the user the ultimate option even if deployed infra is helping make it happen.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yes, as we always do, digital systems should represent the real world, not be a distortion of it.

        It’s OK for online systems to represent a projection of the real world. Not every feature of the real world needs to be represented in every online system.

        It’s OK for the furries to have their server where everyone pretends to be tigers and dragons.

        • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          its also ok for them to go to private residences and dress the part, im usually speaking of data, trust and execution realms. These need to represent the real world since things like giving up your ownership of your data and systems should not be a requirement to use a novel app. This is not how the internet was intended to operate and in the days of 6ghz silicon and ultrafast dram the cryptographic overhead of doing things in a way where you own your digital domain in the same way you might own a house is very real.

          Where you want the technology to not represent the real world is in its abilities to scale, and that’s what’s really crazy where were are with technology today individuals can be companies and small teams are international orgs. This is not just a concept for entrepreneurs but a concept for anyone who wants to take more control over thier presence.

          • fubo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s still okay for people who don’t dress the part to pretend to be tigers and dragons online.

            • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              thats not what i mean either, just like in the real world you can wear masks and costumes or not. you can even wear masks that arent obvious simply pretending to be entirely different people. what else are you looking for, hit me with it.

              • fubo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                The same Elder Internet that spawned Usenet also spawned furries, which seem to have become a standard test case for “so just how tolerant is your community?”