• Recant@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    The piece was definitely slanted.

    Was what the devs did great? No. Does the whole project need to be outcast/abandoned due to what language they use? No. There needs to be nuance with these issues. Open source does not owe individuals anything and that is why it is provided without warranty. On the flip side, individuals can choose not to use it.

    We should be promoting open source software and not have infighting when open source software doesn’t have much mass market appeal to begin with.

    • Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      We should be promoting open source software and not have infighting when open source software doesn’t have much mass market appeal to begin with.

      Just as a side note, I want open source software / free software to have appeal because it is good for people. If the way the promote it to the masses is enabling awful people, I’m really not interested anymore.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Letting fascists loose on github doesn’t make open source software more appealing. Look at how much worse twitter is to be on after relaxing the moderation standards. Now imagine that for open source. We need to make sure open source is approachable to everyone and that means being careful with our language and not being dismissive when someone opens a PR to make the language more approachable to all

      • millie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Absolutely this. Twitter-level toxicity coming out in this thread from outside instances is already a bad indicator of the kind of communities that are peripheral to open source.