cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18475086

I’m not against those who work for sex, but the idea to earn for a living doesn’t seem nice. IMO, sex should be for 2 people (or more for others who prefer polyamory) who wants to be intimate/romantic with each other. My point is money should not be the purpose.

  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    1·
    5 months ago

    This isn’t in the context of utility value vs exchange value. This is separating value creation from the mode of production. Work as in workplace not work as in physical process

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      2·
      5 months ago

      Be that as it may, your ad hoc definition in your first comment was spurious and finds no basis in English language Marxist literature.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        1·
        5 months ago

        Can you phrase this as constructive criticism for which are the proper words to use in this seperate use case or do I need to refer you to the constructive criticism handbook?

        Also, establishing working definitions for use in casual conversation is a thing. Please note that I established definitions for their use.