Google’s campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can’t use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it “presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions.” The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it’s completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

      • @feoh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        Totally agree. Many people who keep using Chrome have a VERY outdated view of what Firefox can do. That’s a shame, but it’s unfortunately an aspect of human nature that negative impressions are SUPER hard to change.

    • The Cuuuuube
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      Using the internet without an adblocker is genuinely dangerous. Everyone really should be using uBlock Origin. Using a web browser that prevents uBlock Origin puts you in danger

  • _haha_oh_wow_
    link
    fedilink
    English
    573 months ago

    Remember like 2 weeks ago when Google’s very own ad networks were distributing malware?

    Pepperidge Farm remembers.

  • @TaintPuncher@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    483 months ago

    It’s not perfect but PiHole will still catch a lot of the ads if you have the know-how to set one up. Tis a relatively cheap and easy solution that has the benefit of being able to block ads network-wide, providing your router lets you set a custom DNS.

    https://pi-hole.net

    • @bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      213 months ago

      Even if my Internet provider forced me to use their router I’d plug my own router in behind that one fuck that.

      • @ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        73 months ago

        Some isp’s have been detecting the second router and giving people shit for it.

        But I’m with you on that, I don’t trust the isp’s backdoored router-modem. Hard pass.

        • youmaynotknow
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          Some isp’s have been detecting the second router and giving people shit for it.

          Giving people shit how? This is the first time I hear something like this. In my case, my ISP does not allow bridging a router, so I NAT mine instead, and it works just fine.

          • @ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            Yeah, they can still tell that you’re Nat behind another router.

            But they don’t like it because it gives them less access to your network and more possibility for something to be wrong

            • Possibly linux
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 months ago

              How would they do that? Maybe by looking at ports? You could just lie and say you only have one device.

              • youmaynotknow
                link
                fedilink
                43 months ago

                The moment they see their ONT is registering only 1 device (the router) it’s clear everything is being routed via that.

                I have never not had a router natted behind my modem. They can see the amount of packets and data I use over the ISP, but that’s about it. On top of that my LANs and VLANs are all VPNd through NordVPN before anything hits the WAN and all DNS traffic goes though my Adguard Home and Quad9 as well, so there’s that.

            • @socphoenix@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              43 months ago

              I’ve never had an isp complain about me using my own router in the US, is this just common in other countries or have I just been lucky?

              • @ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                43 months ago

                It’s a rarity afaik, I’ve only heard of one or two cases, but a concerning report to me personally.

                Though I’m Canadian so it’ll be a few years before it filters here (assuming it catches on)

              • @psud@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                23 months ago

                There’s always NAT. You get one IP address, your router/wifi shares the network using NAT

                But ISPs aren’t looking for NAT, since everyone with wifi is using it

      • @elfpie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        My provider, small one from my town, or the attendant just decided to give me the password. After months, I found out how to extract the configurations and used my old router instead.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73 months ago

      Don’t use Chrome. It has plenty of issues including backdoors by Google.

    • @nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Second this, Pihole is great and protects every device on your network too - mobile phones, smart TVs, tablets, Nintendo Switches, etc.

      It’s wild how much telemetry is baked into stuff that you can just cut the nuts off of.

    • @superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Its worth noting however this can cause weird problems since its system wide and even network wide if you set it up that way.

      As an example, my wifes Spotify podcasts didn’t work for months only for us to discover pihole was blocking the cdn Spotify uses.

  • @Modva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    403 months ago

    Moved to Firefox some months ago, it’s fine. Small adjustment but browsers generally offer high interchangeability

  • Nora
    link
    fedilink
    353 months ago

    And thus, this day will be remembered as the great browser migration.

  • @panicnow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    343 months ago

    You can get a pass till July 2025 by creating/setting a registry key that they made for businesses.

    Paste this in a .reg file and double click it.

    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
    
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Google\Chrome]
    "ExtensionManifestV2Availability"=dword:00000002
    
    • @blackwateropeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      393 months ago

      At this rate people should just cut the cord with google. Modifying reg files is almost as annoying as moving bookmarks over. Firefox + uBlock + pihole (if you’re feeling ambitious/want to block other crap that’s non-browser related) and you’re chillin.

        • @blackwateropeth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          73 months ago

          Yea that’s why say, just as annoying. Which I guess for the PC illiterate registry edits are more dangerous?

          I personally moved off google about 2 years ago (started using start page as well) and haven’t looked back.

    • @Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      343 months ago

      you could instead just download firefox, which isnt perfect either but still a huge improvement over any chromium browser

  • @jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    93 months ago

    This is the perfect time to go aggressive on telling your friends to switch to Firefox