“Gender affirming care” was replaced with “sex change” or “sex reassignment” in at least 19 articles.

  • jadedctrl@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Jesus, this is just about as blatant as you can get. I honestly can’t imagine how people can eat up such clearly dehumanizing politics and not get a bad taste in their mouth…

    Here’s how you can tell if you’re the baddy: Do you support policies to spite or “own” others? Do you think, “fuck ‘em, I don’t care,” “they’re disgusting,” or “they’ve gotta be taught a lesson?”

    Then you’re probably the baddy, stop it! Dehumanization, even casually, is the root of all evil.

    It doesn’t necessarily mean you’re wrong, obviously — you might’ve stumbled into being right for the wrong reasons — but wow, is it a huge red flag!

      • rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think this why it became so important for people in this camp to establish the whole grooming whatnot. To their listeners/readers, they are not dehumanizing, they are saving 😐

        • HaleyHalcyon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When Pride Parades are chanting “we’re here, we’re q****, we’re coming for your children”, you can’t blame grooming accusers for believing that. 🤢

    • ericjmorey@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you think, “fuck ‘em, I don’t care,” “they’re disgusting,” or “they’ve gotta be taught a lesson?”

      I often think this way about Fox News, and Health Insurance Companies, and Gab, and kiwifarms

  • Noreia@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it even legal for news media to misquote someone, especially an elected official?

    • BourbonLaser@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t speak to the legality, but it sure sounds like they violated the terms and agreement in place with AP repeatedly. I wonder what recourse AP has and if they could choose to disallow their content entirely on Fox? It seems like most news organizations get a majority of reporting from AP. I can only imagine the detrimental impact to Fox News if that came to pass.

      • ZapBeebz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, it’s not like anyone goes to Fox for real news anyways. I doubt any of their userbase would complain.

    • ArtZuron@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It does sound like it could be defamation again, which they’d probably lose again to in court. They knowingly misquoted information.

    • gerowen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re not a “news” organization. They’re corporate media, entertainment. They even lost one of their certifications as a “trusted news source” for blatantly lying and regurgitating internet memes without checking their sources.

    • ArtZuron@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They already got baked by that defamation suit that saw tucker leave, so it wouldn’t be as hard to do it again.