At least 206 Jewish anti-Israel protesters were arrested Monday after hundreds rushed the New York Stock Exchange and staged a sit-in outside the Manhattan landmark, police said.

Scores of pro-Palestinian protesters wearing red shirts stormed toward the building on Broad Street in Lower Manhattan — then chained themselves to the doors just before the stock market’s opening bell at 9:30 a.m., footage shows.

A handful of demonstrators, who hail from the Jewish Voices for Peace group, could be seen removing their jackets as they set up shop outside the building — jackets they wore in a possible bid to conceal their anti-Israel attire and thwart any attempt to stop them ahead of time.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Funny how you cite a source that doesn’t even contain the word “Zionist”, “Zionism”, “Zion” anything.

        If you actually have a look at the data you can see there’s very significant chunks that don’t have an issue with BDS, that don’t think that Netanyahu is in any way serious about peace. Those are not the frothing-at-the-mouth Kahanites that people on the US left often mean when they say “Zionist”. Yitzhak Rabin was a Zionist. Murdered by a Zionist.

        It’s more complicated than that and may I remind y’all that Hamas specifically targeted Hippie Kibutzim during their attack, the same kind of people who go into the West Bank during olive harvest so that settlers have a harder time shooting Palestinians, which is one of the reasons why the Israeli government doesn’t give a rat’s arse about the hostages.

        The biggest enemies of the Zionist project, currently, is the type of people running the Israeli government. Because if you’re out for a place for Jews to call home, to live in peace and prosperity, antagonising the fuck out of everyone is not the way to go about it. Traitors to the movement, the lot of them.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        That survey says the opposite of what you think it does. Zionism now is essentially the Jewish version of white supremacy. It’s radical. It’s dangerous.

        But when the survey you link to states quite clearly:

        “And most Jewish adults took the position that God “did not literally give” the land of Israel to the Jewish people (42%) or said they do not believe in God or a higher power at all (24%).”

        That’s not Zionism as currently defined.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I see. So based on your “evidence,” 60% of the percentage of the 80% of Jews that live in America in that combined 80% total of Israel and the U.S. are “Zionists” (even though that’s not what your poll said).

            This is what the poll said:

            Among U.S. Jews overall, 58% say they are very or somewhat emotionally attached to Israel,

            “Somewhat emotionally attached to Israel” is not Zionism by any stretch of the imagination.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                No. No it does not. I live in Indiana. I was born here. I have an emotional attachment to it.

                If Canada decided to invade and turn this into Upper Ontario, because Canadian names are weird, I not only wouldn’t give a shit, I’d welcome the universal healthcare.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    No. And the people who claim they have an emotional attachment to Israel are not necessarily advocating for that either. A point you now seem to be intentionally missing.