• lynny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    And thanks to open source software, we will just remove it if they do. Politicians really don’t understand how this all works do they?

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, that was my thought. Even without OS. It would only work for compiled browsers built within the legal jurisdiction of France. Anyone else would have 0 motive to obey them. And French people would just download non-French browsers.

      Makes it very clear the proposer knows less than 0 about how the Internet works. And has spent even less effort thinking about it. Has he somehow not thought china would have done this, if it was in any way effective?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Politicians really don’t understand how this all works do they?

      For tech-savvy people, not really. And if they do they don’t want to make us mad. We’re InNovAtoRS, after all! (I mean we often are, but it’s still hard not to roll one’s eyes at such a buzzwordy thing)

      For the average Joe who just uses the Chrome browser a device ships with, this could have an effect.

  • utopianfiat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    In order to prevent porn and fraud sites from being accessed, they’re uploading exhaustive lists of those sites to everyone’s computer? Somehow this seems like it won’t work out.

    • magmaus3
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as I know, there are ways to do that without revealing the websites blocked (for example bloom filter, with a note that it can have false positives, or just the hashes of the domains)

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think the catch is more that it will be hard to keep an exhaustive list.

        I’d like to add the whole government misuse angle too. People roll their eyes at that sometimes but It Could Happen Here. History has not ended, that’s just a comforting delusion at this point.

        • Zippy@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          ‘roll their eyes’. Even if they (the government) didn’t try to misuse it, lots of sites will end on it accidently or by deciding individuals that have an agenda. And it suspect it would be a nightmare to get your site off it.

  • Jacobp100@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kind of odd article saying this sort of legislation is bad because it adds features that would be susceptible to scope creep - we already have content blocking in browsers

    • Kit Sorens@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ad-blocker-blockers are already coming up in Chromium. Surely they could make a stronger argument otger than bloatware in modern software.

  • SapphicFemme@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sure there’s a better way that can’t be easily bypassed… Idk allowlist maybe of all known safe domains, any new sites, must register for dns at the government instead of through a private org.

    Another solution allowlist all know webhost who will regularly perform audits of the sites they host for illegal content and remove + report to french authorities. At least these would be better than this easily bypassed “solution”…

    • iopq@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recently bought a domain. But it’s for a year, it might take the government all of a year to approve it, and by that time the domain name renewal would be more expensive.

      ISPs also don’t necessarily host sites