• PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bullshit. You could sell your physical copy on the second hand market. This is protected by the “doctrine of first sale.” When you buy a a copy of a work, you have the right to lend it, trade it, or sell it. This right was functionally eliminated by platforms like Steam.

    • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      First sale doctrine applied because the license is tied to the physical media.

      If you were to make a copy of your DVD and then sell the physical media on to someone else- that’s always been considered piracy In the eyes of the law.

      I’m not making value statements on what’s right and wrong here; I just want to clear up some of the misconceptions around how we currently talk about it.

      My personal belief is that digital licenses should be transferrable just like physical ones, and that any company that wants to offer DRM such that a license key becomes invalid shall allow a license key to be transferred to another user without restriction.

      On a deeper level, the US needs a rethink on the laws surrounding software and copyright, balancing two truths: digital content creators need to make money; and buying a license or right to use any form of digital media IS ownership, and should come with all the same protections as, e.g., buying a physical book.