• Lenggo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      When this came out I went to the ends of the world to get a copy after missing out on all of the references… And then it was fine. I think it’s kinda funny know but I don’t understand how it blew up the way it did

  • Acid@startrek.websiteEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    The first Mad Max movie, just feels like a slog at times to get through and when you finally finish it there’s no resolution it’s just a cliffhanger into the next movie.

  • thegreatloofa@feddit.ukEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    I tried twice to watch The Godfather and fell asleep both times. Nothing about it caught me at all.

  • ThisIsNecessary@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    I’m afraid to watch the Princess Bride because everyone I know loves it and begs me to watch it and I’m afraid it will be terrible and when they ask me how it was I’ll have to lie

  • neomachino@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    I may get a lot of hate for this, and I wouldn’t say it was a huge disappointment because I actually really liked most of the movies but, Star Wars.

    I thought they were great moviees, but when watching them after years of everyone telling me to and all the hype I was kind of disappointed even though I enjoyed watching them all. For me they just didn’t live up to the hype I guess.

  • Finnbarr@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    31·
    1 year ago

    Breakfast club. It doesn’t age well. Bender commits sexual assault, and he’s the hero.

  • balrogslayer@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Donnie Darko.

    Not a terrible movie, just an extremely odd film of which I have never understood the cult following.

  • Akasazh@feddit.nlEnglish
    42·
    1 year ago

    The inglorious bastards. It treats a very serious subject matter with too much quirky humor.

    Also the Nazi slaughter group is basically like an Einsatz Gruppe, but for slaughtering German soldiers. Literally locking people in a building (often a church) and then setting it ablaze was a technique used against Jews.

    Just reversing the roles doesn’t make it an act that’s worth cheering for, like people did in the cinema when I saw it. I couldn’t detach myself from that, hence why I did personally not enjoy it.

    • darkl1nk@lemmy.mlEnglish
      7·
      1 year ago

      Inglorious Bastards ain’t your average war flick or history lesson, it’s Tarantino doing his offbeat thing. The humor’s not mocking the war, but poking at the villains. The Basterds are soldiers, not a hit squad against innocents. The cinema cheers? That’s just folks enjoying seeing the Nazis get some comeuppance. If you didn’t dig it, cool. But remember, Tarantino’s all about pushing buttons and sparking chatter. If it got under your skin, maybe it hit the mark.

      • Akasazh@lemmy.mlEnglish
        01·
        1 year ago

        Inglorious Bastards ain’t your average war flick or history lesson, it’s Tarantino doing his offbeat thing

        I can understand that, I like his style ususally. But that’s point of my disappointment. As a historian I cannot see it apart from the historical events. But the crowd reaction is what really freaked me out, it’s scary if you think of it.

        But remember, Tarantino’s all about pushing buttons and sparking chatter. If it got under your skin, maybe it hit the mark.

        It may have. I think the true brilliance of the movie is how the audience, due to framing, can be induced to condone the killing of innocents. I sincerely hope that wasn’t actually Tarantino’s intention.

        For instance the soldier killed by the bear jew refused to give up military secrets under threat of death. He chooses te respectfully refuse and is then killed. Framed differently in lots of war movies this is a heroic act.

        But here people then cheer when te bear jew comes out and finishes him off.

        All of this is an actual war crime.

        That’s just folks enjoying seeing the Nazis get some comeuppance.

        Indeed and I know, it’s all a bit of good fun. I just can separate it from the very real and very deadly seriousness of this part of history. That was what the main question of this thread was about.

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.mlEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          This is such a weird take when… Why is it scary when the Nazis are obviously the bad guys? This movie is revenge porn against the most indulgent actors in one of the worst parts of European history. Chris waltz is never portraying his character as sympathetic in any way.

          What innocents are being hurt in this movie? The movie goers that are participating it the propaganda screening?

      • Akasazh@feddit.nlEnglish
        17·
        1 year ago

        Listen. It is one of the hardest cases to discern guilt in wartime situations. Membership of the nazi parti or being a german soldier is not per se a sign of guilt. Just like just being a jew is no reason to be killed, too. I’m all for sentencing war criminals, but the soldier killed by bear jew nor the people sitting in the cinema (aside from Hitlers direct circle) have been proven to be guilty of war crimes.

        If you applaud them burning, you’re basicly using the same system of dehumanising a group of people as the nazi party and the SS used for making people belief sloughtering jews, gypsies, gay people is ok. That is very, very wrong.

  • haha_gravity@lemm.eeEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Maybe not a cult classic but the highly praised adaptation of Little Women (2019). It did not have the positive flow and feel compared to the 1994 version. Also, having a 22 year old actress playing the young version of Amy was not a good choice, her sitting between the other girls at school looked ridiculous.

  • jacaw@lemmy.mlEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Synecdoche New York. Every one of my friends who’ve seen it think it’s brilliant. I tried watching it and felt like I was losing my mind. I know that’s the point, but that doesn’t make it a good movie!