I saw a while back that facebook is opening a twitter competitor which will use the ActivityPub protocol, and thus will be able to federate with other fediverse instances, I also saw they invited some fediverse instance admins for an “off the records” meeting in their HQ.

Question is, what is the general stance on this? Because I despise facebook with every fiber of my being, and would very much like to NOT have facebook lurk around these parts, as I understand there is an option to de-federate them like what happened with the exploading heads instance.

  • MindCap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’d assume any actions by Facebook are hostile and are attempts to Embrace, extend, and extinguish

    The strategy’s three phases are:

    • Embrace: Development of software substantially compatible with a competing product, or implementing a public standard.
    • Extend: Addition and promotion of features not supported by the competing product or part of the standard, creating interoperability problems for customers who try to use the “simple” standard.
    • Extinguish: When extensions become a de facto standard because of their dominant market share, they marginalize competitors that do not or cannot support the new extensions.
  • Trent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just more embrace, extend, extinguish crap. Meta absolutely shouldn’t be trusted, especially with their track record so far. Most (though not all) instances I know are defederating.

  • shrugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think federating with an instance that would actually want federation to die (have a monopoly) is a very bad idea. Meta would use it’s leverage to actively undermine and harm the Fediverse, because it’s not in their interest to distribute the userbase to multiple servers they don’t own. They only need it to bootstrap their own service.

    Ever heard the phrase “democracy without democrats”? That would be Meta in the Fediverse.

  • what_is_a_name@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are welcome to use the is core software. But they should be defederated immediately. We have seen this before. It’s never different.

  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    they should stay out.
    usually if corporations try to get on things like this, they try to convert users to their platform then seriously limit or degrade the experience when interacting with anything outside of their stuff.

    so in the end, everyone is trapped in their ecosystem.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Facebook/Meta and the like have proven to be untrustworthy. If they were a person, would you let them federate with your friend group? I wouldn’t. I hope they’re not invited to the party because the things that brought me here are the things that drove me away from there.

  • 𝔊𝔦𝔫𝔧𝔲𝔱𝔰𝔲@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’d say wait and see how it plays out. I’m all for making the fediverse more accessible to the general public, as long as Facebook/Meta doesn’t try anything funny, which does seem unlikely, but we shall see.