bean_dip@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 21 days agoMint rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1353arrow-down14cross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
arrow-up1349arrow-down1imageMint rulelemmy.worldbean_dip@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 21 days agomessage-square18fedilinkcross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
minus-squarebabybus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·20 days agoIt’s more funny/sad if you consider how successful chicken are from this point of view.
minus-squaretunasyne@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·19 days agochickens as a species, sure, but there’s something to be said about the happiness of each individual chicken. read a book once that was like “the more successful a species as a collective is, the less happy each individual is” or smth like that :(
minus-squareCaptain Aggravated@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 days agoIf you want there to be a lot of your species, the best thing to do is become delicious to humans.
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·20 days agoUnless you’re a giant tortoise. It took 300 years to properly classify them. Specimens never survived the voyage back to Europe because they were too delicious.
It’s more funny/sad if you consider how successful chicken are from this point of view.
chickens as a species, sure, but there’s something to be said about the happiness of each individual chicken. read a book once that was like “the more successful a species as a collective is, the less happy each individual is” or smth like that :(
If you want there to be a lot of your species, the best thing to do is become delicious to humans.
Unless you’re a giant tortoise.
It took 300 years to properly classify them. Specimens never survived the voyage back to Europe because they were too delicious.