GiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 5 days agoTrump voters feel very differently about things now that he’s won, our new poll showswww.politico.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1168arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1157arrow-down1external-linkTrump voters feel very differently about things now that he’s won, our new poll showswww.politico.comGiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square47fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAdmiral Patrick@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up57·5 days agoSorry, can’t not laugh at the Freudian slip here. But yeah, low-information and/or single-issue voters are a scourge.
minus-squareccunning@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·5 days agoThe new American way would be to double down on the mistake and deride ptz for not being up to speed on this latest usage of ‘are’…
minus-squareAdmiral Patrick@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·5 days agoApparently I was unaware that “are” is now considered a contronym. lol
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoIt’s like how we now have to specify whether we’re using “literally” as a traditional or modern colloquialism, because the modern definition now encompasses “figuratively” 🫠
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 days ago low-information voters My candidate gave two multi-hour unscripted interviews. Did yours do that?
Sorry, can’t not laugh at the Freudian slip here.
But yeah, low-information and/or single-issue voters are a scourge.
Lol, yeah, case in point. Fixed.
The new American way would be to double down on the mistake and deride ptz for not being up to speed on this latest usage of ‘are’…
Apparently I was unaware that “are” is now considered a contronym. lol
It’s like how we now have to specify whether we’re using “literally” as a traditional or modern colloquialism, because the modern definition now encompasses “figuratively” 🫠
My candidate gave two multi-hour unscripted interviews. Did yours do that?