Morph9@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 days agoCorkscrewlemmy.zipimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1515arrow-down14
arrow-up1511arrow-down1imageCorkscrewlemmy.zipMorph9@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 days agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up57arrow-down1·24 days agoI think you’re right. “Two” being correct in a short form of saying “two too many”.
minus-squareDe_Narm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·24 days agoOkay, I misread that. But two too many implies a third level, otherwise there would be no joke left.
minus-squarejuliebean@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up18·24 days agoi think that perhaps they would have preferred to understand none of the joke, to persist in blissful ignorance.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up12·24 days agoTwo many is grammatically incorrect, but implies a total of two levels
minus-squareLudrollinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 days agoThe ww2 propaganda would be a strech for a third one but still could work.
I think you’re right. “Two” being correct in a short form of saying “two too many”.
Okay, I misread that. But two too many implies a third level, otherwise there would be no joke left.
i think that perhaps they would have preferred to understand none of the joke, to persist in blissful ignorance.
Two many is grammatically incorrect, but implies a total of two levels
The ww2 propaganda would be a strech for a third one but still could work.