• OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yes but now it will be that much more difficult to fight against it - assuming anyone even tries.

      Hunter himself pleaded guilty, and this pardon is prior to sentencing (there are reasons for such obviously), and the justification is not that he is innocent, but that people who commit this crime usually are punished in a civil rather than criminal manner. Plus Biden seemed to be firm that he would never do this, until then he changed his mind and did - which on top of “DOJ bad” adds a measure of “President can do however he pleases”. Especially for people who aren’t paying attention, these are powerful symbols.

      Conservatives were going to try, and who are we kidding almost certainly will have succeeded (definitely eventually anyway, even if heavy pushback might have lengthened the timetable more than they would have preferred), but their chances of succeeding right away are now higher than they were last week.

      I wonder what the alternative would have been - 16 months in jail for the crimes he committed (that was only for one of the two though), vs. what now that will shake the foundation of our nation?

      • koper@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s clear from Trump’s first term that he is not constrained by “optics” or “precedent” at all. He already pardoned a large number of his allies for personal gain. He was always going to abuse the system regardless.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          He is not, but centrists who aren’t paying close attention are.

          Most American’s don’t pay close attention, and many are vulnerable to such an optic.

          This fuels the thought that the Dems are corrupt - which ofc they are (not saying that this is an example of that, just in general) - though they are by no means equally so to the other side.

          I’m not even suggesting that he should have done differently - maybe? but what do I know? - I am saying that this will become fodder for the other side to claim corruption.