• kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 minutes ago

    I think there are two primary reasons for the difference in treatment of these two killings

    1. The killing of the CEO was meant to be a message to the country. It’s a different scale. Because something like this is such a spectacle, it gets national attention and the local and federal authorities are forced to deal with it quickly- otherwise they lose face.

    2. Ultimately the power structure cannot tolerate these types of rebellions. It’s like a slave talking back to the master. You allow it once and you open the door for it to happen again. You have to try and shut it down as quickly as possible.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Sen. John Fetterman is one of those who has loudly insisted that the “public execution of an innocent man and father of two is indefensible.” We are expected to ignore the fact that for 14 months straight before Thompson’s killing, Israeli forces have publicly executed thousands of innocent men, women, and children in Gaza with the enthusiastic support of US politicians like Fetterman.”

    Normally I’m not one to dig into these things, but I seriously think fetterman died and the dude we hear from now is a stand in. Just such a 180… I remember when he was first gaining national prominence, had some interview in front of a Wawa off the freeway - when I saw THAT guy, I donated to his campaign and called my wife in to say, “listen to this for a second, I think this guy could be the president one day”. That guy has ZERO DNA in common with the “Fetterman” we see and hear from today. It wasn’t a stroke, or if it was, it was fatal.

  • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Our society ties worth to wealth.

    To a capitalist, If you’re homeless, you have less moral value than someone who exploited millions of people’s need for healthcare for his own gain.

    And there are a lot of capitalists.

    • ddplf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I could waste my effort answering you straight away, but I’d rather waste it telling you to read at least the fucking description.

        • ddplf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          haha oh man you got me, that was funny and certainly very intentional of you

          • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Actually I’m sorry it wasn’t intentional but you did get a proper whoosh there happens to everyone

  • Sharpiemarker@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I’ve seen people comparing the DOJ response to Luigi Mangioni and Kyle Shittenhouse. The fact that Rittenhouse is free should tell you everything you need to know.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Well the difference is that while both actively premeditated their murders whoever committed the crimes Mangioni has been accused of is far more of a menace because they had a specific target in mind and even worse it was someone rich instead of just anyone protesting the police tendency to murder.

      • prayer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Rittenhouse attacked 3 people, that’s 3x the danger. But I guess I forgot to count up their net worths.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Sure he was attacked in the same way you attack a burglar. He shouldve been hanged for waving that fucken rifle around outside of his hometown let alone in a different state. But such mistakes can always be corrected.

            • Jamablaya@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              3 hours ago

              oh ffs. you are clearly unaware of how laws work in the particular states where this occurred, and are trying to staple vaguely European or Canadian laws on to the situation, mostly which are considered pretty fascist by those under them.

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I am simply stating that the locals of the town should’ve hanged him, this aint a legal argument on my part. I am but a simple Californian stating that I think Kyle Rittenhouse deserves death, my morality rarely aligns to law.

        • A7thStone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          You don’t straw buy an AR then pick it up and cross state lines with it going to a known chaotic protest without premeditated “self defence”.

          • Jamablaya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yeah and you don’t get acquitted of that either. Also one of the surviving “victims” doesn’t blow the prosecution’s case by being honest in your scenario. That look of defeat photo is priceless.

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Carrying a gun is “premeditated self defence”? Are people only supposed to carry guns where it is safe? What is the purpose of that?

            So many people pushing this ridiculous idea he is guilty for not staying at home, quaking in his boots. Right to self defense and to bear arms literally exist so that people don’t have to fear walking outside because of asshat violent criminals and rioters.

            And even more ridiculous saying the police and prosecutors didn’t care. What do you mean? They went after him with everything they had. It was a jury of his peers that told them to f off with that shit.

            But I guess lemmy only likes juries if they nullify actual murderers they like, not when they let go an innocent person they don’t like. (I don’t like Rittenhouse either, but that does not make him a murderer.)

            • GNUTup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I remember when I was a freshman in high school, I worked at a McDonald’s. For whatever reason, I owned a Burger King t shirt. As a 14 year old, I thought it would be funny to wear the Burger King shirt to work. I figured it would annoy my boss and might get a few reactions out of other people. It didn’t work, but there were no real consequences because of it.

              You really can’t see how Rittenhouse did a similar thing? He went to a protest knowing he was diametrically opposite, politically, to people actually protesting and he did it with a big ass gun. Like my Burger King t shirt, this was very clearly sending a message of “I am your enemy.” And the message wasn’t on a harmless shirt, it was on a deadly big ass gun.

              You really truly believe he had no intention of killing? Are you dumb?

                • GNUTup@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 hour ago

                  Rittenhouse was not a cop, he was a douchebag little shit stirrer with a murder fantasy, and he got exactly what he wanted — a fun murder spree killing liberals with no consequences.

                  I’m not going to coordinate an effort to lynch the piece of shit, but spreading bullshit about how “he’s not a murderer,” like what you’re doing, is disingenuous at best. Kindly, shut the fuck up

            • Zement@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Everything they had? He’s still alive. That’s more than most shooters get.

                • Zement@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  No? But usually shooters get shot, especially if they shoot blindly into unarmed folks. How isn’t anyone able to read any more? Did I write trial?

        • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          He deliberately brandished a weapon to incite bystanders to try to defend themselves so he could kill them and call it self defense.

          • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            “Brandishing” a weapon isn’t a crime in Wisconsin. Even if it were, it wouldn’t justify vigilantes attempting to kill him.

            • GNUTup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              A hunter in the woods lays a trap. A coyote walks by and gets its foot caught in the trap. The hunter approaches and the coyote bites the hunter.

              You feel the coyote was unjustified?

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          He absolutely did though, the whole point was he wanted to get into a fight be “forced” to defend himself.

            • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              17 hours ago

              He was literally filmed that night watching Antifa Members leave a CVS, where he said “If only I had my gun on me right now”

              He was also in an interview with a militia group bragging about “Never using non-lethal”

              He also had various facebook posts where he talked about wanting to kill.

              He also had a history of schoolyard violence against young girls.

              These were disallowed from being admitted as evidence by the judge who claimed these were “irrelevant”, even though they clearly paint a motive.

              There’s also the fact that you don’t travel across state lines with an illegal weapon because you love somebody else’s property that much. He had claimed he had been “Hired to protect a dealership” and that he was “Only there to provide medical assistance with the gun being purely for protection”, at one point he’d even been asked to leave by police who only allowed him to stay because he lied about being a “Trained EMT”

              Which resulted in the (often played out of context) clip of the police saying “We appreciate you guys, we really do!” as they gave him bottles of water. (Yet no charges for lying to law enforcement, self-misrepresentation, or “Stolen Valor”, curious)

              The fact that he wore gloves at all times while handling the weapon also shows he intended to use it for criminal purposes and took steps to hide his fingerprints.

              The evidence of pre-mediation is overwhelming, had the Judge not been a MAGA-Plant and the Prosecution not been incompetent “DID THE VIDEO GAMES MAKE YOU DO IT KYLE?!!?!”

              It’s pretty obvious how this would have gone

            • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              let’s just leave rittenhouse out of this. he got away, whatever.

              it is divisive, focus on the topic at hand. Luigi likely did not do it and health insurance it trash that must be reformed.

              • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Luigi likely did not do it and health insurance it trash that must be reformed.

                Ah you’re right, I think that’s what matters more too. This is going to be one hell of a trial.

                • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  If the Judge were to ask me, I’d say pretty sure Luigi didn’t do it, I thought I saw Nancy Mace with the glock though.

        • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I don’t think other commenters bothered to watch the trial.

          He was acting foolish but he certainly didn’t commit pre-meditated murder.

  • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    A stark reminder of who the justice system works for. They are there to protect the rich elites.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You reminded me of something I read from back around when that bloke got elected, regarding amongst other things, the decline in the rule of law mattering to society…

      "The greatness of Rome, brilliant with repeated marks of prosperity, has gradually faded… the ancient glory of military prowess and valour has almost passed away… by the growth of wealth and luxury.

      The Roman world is falling: yet we concern ourselves with trifles… We heap up riches that perish and bury our gold in the earth as if we were piling up treasures in a lifetime of prosperity.

      Rome was great and could tolerate its own vices as long as they were held in check by some degree of virtue; but when our hands ceased to uphold the laws, when avarice and luxury sapped the nation’s strength, the state itself lost control and went its way.

      The finest men were shut out from office by the lowest dregs of society, who, having won the favour of the mob by base means, ventured to grasp at the highest offices.

      The greater her glory, the more incredible it seems that she has been brought so low.

      Empires are mortal. Rome has perished. Though she was built upon such firm foundations, Rome has sunk by her own weight."

      - Ammianus Marcellinus, Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus, Tacitus, Aurelius Ambrosius, Aurelius Augustinus Hipponensis. 56 - 430 AD.

      • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Can you indicate which author is associated with which portion of your quoted text? I’m looking to verify the provenance of these statements. Thank you.

        • Obinice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Alas no, I saw this a while back and saved it. I believe they’re mostly a mix of direct quotes (or as much as one can be given they weren’t speaking English), and a lot of summations from their published works. So rather than reading a whole book, you get a few sentences carrying their main points.

          At least that’s what I recall :-)

          My suggestion would be to look in to the authors, find their relevant works and give them a read, that’ll give you the same thoughts and opinions but with way more detail :-D

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yet the Roman Empire survived and thrived for about a millennium afterwards.

          • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Unfair, there is still actual debate amongst historians and scholars about when the Roman empire ended, and if ever, it fell.

            • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Among which historians specifically? I’m unaware of any serious debate here other than propagandists using the name second Rome, third Rome, ceaser etc. sorry buddy Roman empire collapsed when the franks, Visigoths, ostrogoths and Huns toppled the west. Wanna know why it ended then? Byzantine had split long before into a separate entity to distance itself from Rome and when it collapsed it chugged along with it’s greek orthodox ideals

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    On Monday, 26-year-old Daniel Penny was acquitted after killing Jordan Neely, a desperate Black homeless man on the subway…

    Tale as old as time.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      “…on the grounds that he was trying to protect others.”

      I think that’s a pretty fucking important line right there.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I think the point is, the system pushed one man to his breaking point simply for being poor, black, and mentally ill; resulting in his eventual strangulation on a subway. Not saying the the situation didn’t require intervention but acting as if the whole thing was “unavoidable” or even “justified” gladiator giving all the context is Pretty Fucking Important

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It wasn’t unavoidable but also it was his aggressive behaviour towards others that directly lead to him being subdued. I’m not sure the situation would’ve been different with a white guy acting aggressive towards fellow passengers, especially a mother and her child.

          • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            The point is neither situation should ever happen in a system that puts humanity over profits. A mentally ill, homeless, and starving person should exist in our society because we have the means to house, feed, and provide Healthcare for everyone. (we just don’t have the morality)

            Also, the strangle hold was applied for 5 min. I’m no expert but when someone goes limp from blood flow being blocked, you usually don’t need to continue choking them for an additional 4 min.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              It shouldn’t happen but such a situation where someone becomes hostile can occur even when theoretically everyone’s every need is taken care of. It’s unfortunate that it did though.

              Also, the strangle hold was applied for 5 min. I’m no expert but when someone goes limp from blood flow being blocked, you usually don’t need to continue choking them for an additional 4 min.

              That’s what the court case was over. Nobody is really disagreeing about the homeless man having been aggressive and a threat and needing to be subdued, it was just about whether the person who subdued him was guilty of “criminally negligent homicide”.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Imagine if the defense pulls that line in court. My client gun down this man to save lives your honor!

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The whole thing seems to have been about if the guy went too far in subduing the homeless dude who was by all accounts acting crazy and aggressive towards other passengers, including a woman with a child with her.

        It’s so crazy reading different characterizations of the situation. Some are saying how the guy heroically saved other passengers by strangling an aggressive homeless dude for six minutes, even after other passengers had apparently left, others are saying how a vicious white attacker decided to murder a desperate BLACK victim of the system without any reason.

        Wild shit.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Well, a judge decided to drop the charges. I don’t know all of the details of the case but I’ll hunt for them later today.

          I do know that if passengers felt threatened and this dude stepped up and helped, it’s unfortunate that it ended badly, but good for him doing something.

          I’m not the type to fight in a crazy situation unless I’m backed into a corner and I would be thankful to any person with the balls to step in.

          I don’t know why we have to go around comparing unrelated situations or looking for anything to justify our feelings.

          It’s like when George Floyd was killed and a bunch of assholes went digging for why that was ok. “He used drugs, he had a counterfeit 20, blah blah blah. What about so and so who got shot, HE WAS WHITE U NO!!!”

          This dude wasn’t a police officer and if he was protecting passengers we should be holding him up as a hero too. We can feel sorry for the dude who died, but we don’t need to vilify anyone except maybe the system that failed to help a man in a mental health crisis. That is, if helping fellow passengers was his motivation and that appears to be the case.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Even the prosecution seemed to say that the initial reaction was justified because the other guy was aggressive and hostile in a crowded train, but that the measures taken to subdue him went too far

            From the New Yorker article linked in the posted article:

            “His initial intent was even laudable, to protect fellow subway riders from a man he perceived to be a threat.” But the law does not permit “laudable behavior” when it is also “unnecessarily reckless,” Yoran went on. Her opening statement—in which she described how Penny held Neely in a choke hold for almost six minutes, even after the train doors had opened and the other straphangers had fled to safety—concluded, “The defendant was not justified in these deadly actions. He used far too much force for far too long. He went way too far.” Later, the jury—twelve jurors and four alternates, all hailing from Manhattan—would need to decide for themselves whether the Assistant District Attorney was correct.

            • theangryseal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Yeah, I guess. I don’t think we should be parading this guy around as a villain. Even if he held the dude for too long, it’s a scary situation that he was in and who knows what will happen if you let someone go who has been aggressive. He isn’t a police officer, he didn’t have handcuffs and a taser, he was just a dude on a train.

              • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Making decisions based on fear alone is what’s causing deaths like the one on the train. If fear hadn’t griped him he would have recognized that once the dude stopped moving he could let go.

                And before anyone comes at me here, I have done almost the same thing to a guy outside a bar. He was drunk as a skunk, had been beat up and was bleeding from a head wound, and wasn’t thinking clearly. I held him in a close-to a choke hold but was still worried if I let him go he’d turn around and clock me. But I still let him go after a few minutes. He did punch me (not in the face), then left it at that.

                Too many are running on fear these days, including cops, and we don’t need it. It’s useless. If I, as a woman, can understand that and still do the ‘right’ thing, why can’t I expect a dude to do the same?

                • theangryseal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  It’s cool that you are you with the info you have in your head. Not everyone is you and no one deserves prison time for protecting their fellow humans.

                  I cannot be swayed in that view. I grew up surrounded by idiots and endured daily violence and more than one person I knew growing up is in prison for actual murder and more than one friend is currently in a grave because no one stepped up.

                  If you’d like, private message me and I’ll share article after article with you. I’m sure I can find them in archives at least.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Sir, this is a class war!

      America is majority white so gonna be majority white assholes… don’t worry non-“white” countries have pretty much same thing going.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      What race is that?

      Honestly I just funnel my hair towards the rich since they are the ones who built and maintain the system.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              19 hours ago

              It’s power not skin color. I get it, it’s uncomfortable seeing how people who look like us plundered the world and have caused untold suffering while propping up those of us who look similar. And I don’t begrudge the oppressed the right to be angry at the whole of the privileged group. But as white people we don’t help by hating white people, we help by working to right the wrongs that gave us this privilege and by striving for a fair, just, and equal society.

            • Sazruk@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Why don’t we just hate all the races? Oh wait, corruption has very little to do with race and everything to do with capitalistic greed,

            • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Sure, but at some point you have to take responsibility for your own actions. Blaming the past for current ruin and corruption is a tool of the corrupt.

            • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              yes that is mostly true but there are some places that have segregated and treated other fellow humans (even the same skin color)differently in a classism system. Rwanda is good example even before Germany or Belgium went there and made it worse.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s uh pretty normal hair?

      We can attack the guys shit character, without having to insult how people look.