• 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s not a problem until someone tells you to not refer to them as a dude or a guy. If you continue, you are just an asshole 🤷🏻

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Sure, but we’re talking plurals of strangers atm. “Please don’t call me a guy going forward” is a different conversation than “what you just said is stupid, mean, and wrong”.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Your facts are not what OP wrote, though. And in this context the facts are relevant, which is the point.

        Bad red herring.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          We don’t know what happened. What makes you think that what op wrote isn’t the facts. I can totally see something like that happening it’s not at all unbelievable.

        • weker01@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          No it really isn’t. One clearly and directly communicates a need. The other response shies away from that and insults without explaining why.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            10 days ago

            Drag… Supposes, that’s how it would look without applying much empathy. But if someone gets called something and says it’s bad, it must be clear they don’t like it. If they’re angry, that’s a kind of upset. It means they could be hurting. Drag would understand no matter how someone phrased it.

            • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 days ago

              If the other party is 3, then yes. From adults I expect ability to differentiate between stating a need and throwing a tantrum.

              • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                10 days ago

                Drag is very forgiving when a trans person is upset they’ve been misgendered. Growing up as the wrong gender is traumatic. It can literally give you cPTSD and personality disorders. Being triggered because you feel like you’re back in that situation is a completely understandable response. Drag uses gender neutral “guys”, but acknowledges that it’s a dangerous practice, and if you hurt someone then you need to own it. They don’t owe anyone politeness in that moment. If drag didn’t like that responsibility, drag wouldn’t take risks with other people’s mental health.

                • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Out of curiosity, have your therapist told you ever about the dangers of using third person pronoun when expressing yourself? Like it strengthens the disassociation between you and your body and mind, etc. etc? If not, please change them.

                  This is coming from a genuine place, I’m not trying to be sarcastic or mean.

                  • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    Fortunately, drag doesn’t use third person pronouns for dragself. You assumed they were third person because you’re only used to seeing that conjugation with third person. But conjugation doesn’t have a relationship to grammatical person in English. One form of conjugation can apply in multiple persons.

    • teslasaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 days ago

      Or, just maybe. The person remarking is an asshole. It gives off the same energy as correcting grammar when talking with someone.

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Why does the other persons energy matter? If someone requests not to be called something and you continue to call them that then you are kinda being a jerk. It’s not the same as correcting someone’s grammar.

        • teslasaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 days ago

          Cause it’s rude. Like correcting grammar in a conversation. Both would be equally rude.

          Nobody wants to be told that what they’ve learned and have been taught to them their whole life is now an offense. Just like nobody wants to be misgendered on purpose.

      • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        It gives off the same energy as correcting grammar when talking with someone.

        Is this a personal attack?

        • kipo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          The fact that you’re getting downvoted for essentially saying “just be a respectful, reasonable, and decent human being” is pretty bizarre. Like, can we just have some empathy and patience for each other?

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          If someone asks you to stop something simple and of no consequence to you just do it out of respect. Why does everyone feel entitled to a concrete argument and being convinced before just respecting folks? It’s ridiculous.

          What about half of the people in the comments seem to fail to understand is that the way the lady correcting OP’s language is the biggest factor.

          Her saying “hey, could you please not refer to me as a guy?” is completely different from her getting angry and going off on a rant. The former situation is worth continuing the discussion, and the latter situation leads to people rightfully avoiding that lady.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        It’s just as much not a problem for them to be offended by it as it is for you to choose your words better. Knowing that you made a choice to offend so yeah, you’re the jerk. You’re honestly making a lot more of it if you went all this distance to think you’re the one hard done by just cuz you refuse to memorize some words. That’s snowflake thinking.

        Only bad actors looking for the drama go for the path of most resistance.

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            There are harder things in life that are actually worth complaining about. Growing your brain isn’t one of them.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              No, that’s different. Names occupy a different role than generic words, and you’re primed to be able to handle that. To claim that’s the same thing as replacing common words is dishonest or uninformed.