• 3 Posts
  • 1.39K Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月22日

help-circle





  • For the love of god, someone wake me if y’all find a summation of the findings of the Jane Austen’s Paper Trail by Naomi Joseph podcast, and not just a review of the podcast, which is itself a sort of review couched in a dialogue between experts who (from a distance) seem content to preface or end each-and-every musing with “it’s a mystery, innit?”

    For the record, I’ve read most of Jane Austen’s novels. It’s this modern meta-of-a-meta take on it all that’s got me cross-eyed and wondering why I should bother. Please stop hawking pod-casts in literary spaces.






  • They generally base such things on the likelihood of finding issues in a given timeframe.

    Pretending that’s lower so soon after construction “if only it were built properly” is backwards and wrong. In-depth inspections are more common and necessary in the weeks, months, years closer to initial construction, and their findings identify issues that need checked as time goes on.

    You don’t check more often and thoroughly because you did a shit job at construction, in fact avoiding/faking inspections is one of the CHIEF hallmarks of shody work and corruption.

    You see, that’s when people die.



  • I thought it was interesting that the two countries topping my “move to” list were on opposite ends of the scale, but no, turns out Paraguay is “no data”, not light green.

    Peru already looked great to me, and this clinches it nicely, provided their fascist-wannabe’s don’t succeed any time soon.

    I really like the concept and execution of this map, but a lot of the “no data” countries are confusing to me … countries I don’t usually see with no survey responses at all, or so I thought.

    On the other hand, multiple waves of surveys totalling over 1000 responses for each country that was surveyed is surprisingly robust, vs what I’m used to encountering.