• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is not “false” this is just “pants on fire lying”

    This person should not have the freedom to speak publicly anymore

    Screw freedom of expression as we currently have it. Freedom of expression should become a right with responsibility. if you can’t be responsible, you can’t have the right. You either speak the truth or don’t get to speak to groups, period

    I’m SO done with literally everyone and everything lying with zero repercussions. Companies lie, all fine. Politicians lie like there is no tomorrow and that’s fiiiiine, even Obama lied like 25% and that’s fiiiiine, trump literally lies 99% of the time and it’s all fine! Nothing happens, so we just lie more and more and you can’t trust anything or anyone anymore

    Freedom of expression on the internet was a big mistake

  • skip0110@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The original post has 58k views, the correct information has 2k. That is the level of efficiency that site has in disseminating correct information.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    This is a great example of the importance of teaching people critical thinking skills.

    If you stop to analyze what was written in this sensationalized post rather than acting on your emotions, the first question that should come into mind is “who stopped them?”. There are no checkpoints between Oregon and California where cars are turned away from crossing state lines due to emissions. In fact, that would probably violate federal free travel laws which would supercede any stupid law like that.

    Next, consider the source. Is this person trustworthy? Did they provide ample citations to reputable journalistic outlets that verified the factuality of the claims? If not, they may be trying to deceive you with falsehoods or have an ulterior motive for misrepresenting the facts. At best they are repeating claims that they’ve heard from others and anything they report on should be taken with a grain of salt.

    This post doesn’t hold up to the slightest amount of scrutiny, but people get fooled every day by crap like this. My advice is that if you hear something that sounds outrageous or too good to be true, stop and think carefully about it for a few minutes, or maybe just wait for another source to report it. Saves you a lot of stress and protects you from endlessly doomscrolling.

    • limelight79@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      A friend of mine posted something on Facebook (reposted from a local list in Arizona) claiming that two people were knocking on doors and beating up people, and one woman was in the hospital as a result. Pictures of the perpetrators and everything.

      Something felt off, so I did a quick search on their names. And I found an article from some city in Texas where the same rumor had been circulating about that area. The article clarified that the two people had committed some crimes several years ago and were caught, tried, and convicted already.

      So someone took one of these, changed the name of the area, and posted it to the local list. Why do people do this? A form of stochastic terrorism maybe?

      Edit - I can’t find the post (I think my friend deleted it), but I did still have a tab open with the article about it.

      • WamGams@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I have noticed this as well. Back during the early facebook years, a “news” outlet would just generate content by posting stories like “Greenville ranked as the city with highest crime rate” every week or so.

        Everybody on my facebook feed would go crazy saying things like “I always knew that town was dangerous, but to hear it outranks New York? TERRIFYING!”

        Only issue is that this outlet would have 50 different URLs for the article, all giving a city in a different state (always an immigrant heavy suburb) and those articles would be appear around facebook and nobody would know the wiser.

        It costs almost nothing for them to rewrite the world and your perspective about it. The granularity they are now capable of should give us pause.

        • limelight79@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Interesting. This one didn’t include a link to an article, just fear mongering.

          The person that posted it deleted it after my comment, I think. I’ll check.

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I assume the people in the picture were “melanin enriched”? There you have your answer.

        It’s a shame that you can’t know when seeing such posts if the person resharing it has good intentions or not. “Don’t open your door for strangers” is often good advice after all.

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The firetrucks were allowed through but Haitian immigrants ate them!

      You expect too much from these people, and an increasing share of them aren’t genuine people at all.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The firetrucks were allowed through but Haitian immigrants ate them!

        That sounds reasonable and matches what the Big Red Squid told me on TV after last nights meth binge.

    • sola@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Teaching critical thinking skills it not a solution. People are not getting fooled, they want to believe it, it fills an emotional need.

      Neo-liberal solutions to societal issues focusing on individuals has been a complete disaster. It is basically victim blaming and doesn’t actually scale in many circumstances.

      Eg. High house prices; Victims fault for not working harder and saving more. Neo-liberal solution: Work longer, spend way less. Outcome at scale: Economy crashes due to low spending.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I agree with the rest, but

        Teaching critical thinking skills it not a solution. People are not getting fooled, they want to believe it, it fills an emotional need.

        Yes. Properly taught critical thinking overrides the emotional thinking. If it didn’t, people wouldn’t anymore then animals.

        • sola@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s the thing, people don’t want to. Critical thinking for one it takes more physical energy, which is a impediment. People want to belong as it can be very difficult to thrive being excluded, so there can be an advantage to just go along with the dominate narrative. Hence why we are getting a onslaught of propaganda like this twitter post.

    • valtia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      “who stopped them?”. There are no checkpoints between Oregon and California

      … actually, there are checkpoints along every major roadway into California that do check incoming vehicles, mostly to find and prevent invasive species from entering the state and affecting the agricultural industry, and more broadly to protect the environmental systems in California. There have, in fact, been legal challenges against these checkpoints for violating travel laws, but the checkpoints have remained. They’ve also been used to seize non-agricultural items like weed, weapons smuggling, etc. so emissions standards checking isn’t completely out of the realm.

      Obviously, she’s lying and she doesn’t know any of this either anyway. But there are checkpoints to enter California.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Border_Protection_Stations

      • Trilobite@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I go through one all the time there has not been anyone there stopping people for years now

      • Captain_CapsLock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I can’t speak for all of them, but the I5 border station near the Oregon border hasn’t even been manned in several years. This gal is so full of shit.

        • CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The station on Highway 97 has someone there, they’ve always just waved me through and said “have a nice day” i think they stop and inspect the agricultural trucks that go through there, tho.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah, you’re right, but you also conveniently cut out the second half of my sentence where I specifically mentioned being turned away for emissions. Context matters.

        • Trilobite@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          As long as a car is registered and insured they have the right to drive in any state

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Additionally, Washington, Oregon, California, and BC (this one has to have some sort of international limitations) have a climate pact with eachother to adopt emission and climate policies set by the other states/province.

      Out of all the states that CA would have emissions issues with, OR would not be one of them.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I mean I wouldn’t ever live in California, but not because of what these talking maga skin piles keep saying. I just revise to live in a disaster-prone region. I mean California has a fire season. Fuuuuuck that. Same goes for hurricane territory.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    296
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s not like there’s a state border check for vehicle emissions. You can visit California in a non-California car without an emissions check. Joy’s claim doesn’t make sense even before fact checking.

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Anyone politicizing the fires from the comfort of a place that isn’t burning to the ground, should immediately shut the fuck up.

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They are inside the fire too, look at Mel Gibson’s interview practically WHILE his house was burning.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Personally I would go so far as to say that people politicizing the fires from a place that is burning to the ground should probably also immediately shut up and flee the building.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well apparently believing in climate change is political over here, and I don’t think it’s wrong to point to this as evidence that we need to make some serious changes.

  • Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Too late. It’s already become true, and another example of wokeness for your racist uncle to bang on about.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is exactly why so many things just feel hopeless to me. The worst people have caught on to, and the parrots don’t even realize, that you can just say literally anything and the occupants of your echo chamber will believe it immediately and then refuse to believe whatever reality actually is if it is presented to them by literally any other “outsider.”

      Hell even someone of the “in-group” who is not substantial enough will be outed as an “other” if they dare go against the initial message.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The knock-on effects of this also concern me. Largely, the only effective way I’ve seen to battle disinformation is to retreat to smaller spaces. The intensity and engagement driven content loop on all the major platforms just fuels the fire. Ultimately, to achieve a better admin:user ratio where the admins aren’t idiots. While I wax nostalgic about my former BBS days, it feels like a giant step backwards to that. The quality on content is there and signal:noise ratio is sublime, but the amount of information, level of discourse, and widespread geographic socialization, isn’t.

        • ch00f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Since the election, I’ve retreated from most news sources and reddit. I kind of realized that more or less every headline was either a lie, clickbait, or blowing up a story that largely doesn’t matter. I honestly haven’t felt more relaxed in years.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Who is surprised? People are upset. The two are not the same reaction.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ah yes, the notorious CA Border Control keeping visitors out. Make sure you bring your CA visa if you want to enter the state. 🙄

    These people are fucking off the charts insane.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.

    Driving Californians (particularly the wealthy and well-connected Malibu celebrity class) insane with rage and paranoia, then pointing them at the milquetoast liberal stand-ins for Far-Left Radicalism, will do to California what it did to New York, Texas, and Florida.

    Just a matter of time before the right-wing propaganda machine crushes the brains of the enfranchised class. I’m already hearing my mother-in-law blame the stupid Los Angelinos for raising her own home insurance rates. And more than a few coworkers are smugly insisting this is what a DEI fire department gets you.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Its not the Republican-ism that comes first. You have to sell people on the “I’m exceptional” mentality first, then insist they’re being exploited by their inferiors. Malibu celebrities are a target rich environment for this kind of delusional elitism.

        Expect a lot more Californians going on Joe Rogan and making up tall tales about how the fire was caused by poors and illegals stealing all the good firefighting water, while the state refused help for some arcane bureaucratic reasons related to The Fairness Doctrine.

        • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Nevermind that there is a legitimate argument that deregulation made the fire as bad as it is.

          Because one of the things deregulated in the LA area was the building of homes in high fire risk areas. like the ones currently on fire.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 hours ago

            deregulation made the fire as bad as it is

            The California water system is a dense web of legal contracts between public and private interests. Bad policy made the fires worse, as the central valley was transformed from an ecological paradise into a dried up scrubland. But the idea that California ever really had regulations to prevent these wildfires is naive.

            one of the things deregulated in the LA area was the building of homes in high fire risk areas

            Fires are running straight up to the Malibu coastline. High risk areas have been expanding with the repetitive droughts and the large agricultural developments of cash crops. You’ve got buildings going up in flames that were perfectly safe to live in 20 or 30 years ago.

            Nothing the California state government had done up to this point was preventing the degradation of the local ecology. They’re just at the end of their rope.