cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days agoLet's not jump to conclusionslemmy.mlimagemessage-square151fedilinkarrow-up11.65Karrow-down166
arrow-up11.59Karrow-down1imageLet's not jump to conclusionslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square151fedilink
minus-squarewolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoIt literally DOES start with that! That’s the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-22 days agoYou asked “Am wrong?”. The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That’s what was wrong.
minus-squarewolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoYes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them. Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don’t understand the few words.
It literally DOES start with that! That’s the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.
You asked “Am wrong?”.
The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That’s what was wrong.
Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.
Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don’t understand the few words.