☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Socialism@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoIt's ok to resist capitalism on an iPhonemedia.mas.toimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1102arrow-down116
arrow-up186arrow-down1imageIt's ok to resist capitalism on an iPhonemedia.mas.to☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Socialism@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squarerelative_iterator@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoAt least the iPhone has a much better track record for privacy and security.
minus-squareZeeroover@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoAll alternatives are capitalist too. Even the Fairphone. If anyone thinks different they might want to consider to look up what capitalism means.
minus-squarePapyrusOsiris@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoSecurity through obscurity is no security at all. You’ve fallen for the marketing if you think apple cares about your privacy any more than any other big tech company.
minus-squaresoybison@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·2 years agoYou’re right! And the reason why is because they have to compete in a public competition!
At least the iPhone has a much better track record for privacy and security.
All alternatives are capitalist too. Even the Fairphone. If anyone thinks different they might want to consider to look up what capitalism means.
Security through obscurity is no security at all. You’ve fallen for the marketing if you think apple cares about your privacy any more than any other big tech company.
You’re right! And the reason why is because they have to compete in a public competition!