• NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    How can you have a society where everyone is equal and free if you don’t define the right of individuals to be equal and free

    it seems pretty obvious that we can just observe whether everybody is equal and free, and if somebody is preventing somebody else from being equal or free, tell them to knock it off.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      When people are told to change their behavior, sometimes their response is just to say fuck off. How could we possibly expect compliance without codifying what they should comply with? How would you deal with conflicting values? As much as governments are the single largest cause of mass murders and deaths, this is the one thing they are good for: defining parameters.

      • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        How could we possibly expect compliance without codifying what they should comply with?

        none of this necessitates rights