Zerush@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoDavid Sacks claims there's 'substantial evidence' that DeepSeek used OpenAI's models to train its own | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1128arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1117arrow-down1external-linkDavid Sacks claims there's 'substantial evidence' that DeepSeek used OpenAI's models to train its own | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comZerush@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square61fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNadru@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up95arrow-down1·2 days agoStealing from thieves is not theft
minus-squareharsh3466@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 day agoCame to say something similar. Like I give a fuck that OpenAI’s model/tech/whatever was “stolen” by Deepseek. Fuck that piece of shit Sam Altman.
minus-squarewewbull@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·1 day ago“Recieving stolen goods” is prosecutable. It’s a lesser crime than the original theft though.
Stealing from thieves is not theft
Came to say something similar. Like I give a fuck that OpenAI’s model/tech/whatever was “stolen” by Deepseek. Fuck that piece of shit Sam Altman.
“Recieving stolen goods” is prosecutable.
It’s a lesser crime than the original theft though.