• bob_wiley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    It makes you wonder when it will be cheaper to hire back cashiers to avoid so much loss to theft.

        • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          “We have not seen any material reaction from consumers,” P&G CFO Andre Schulten said. “So that makes us feel good about our relative position.”

          There it is folks. Straight from the horse’s mouth. They won’t do what’s in the best interest of humanity without “material reaction” (ie; an arsonist or maybe even something more extreme.)

        • IverCoder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not an American, isn’t there a limit on how you can raise prices? At least in my country we have "SRP"s (suggested retail price) and whoever exceeds that will need a good reason to do so, and simply citing theft will not be an enough reason.

          • Wilziac@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            We have the MSRP (Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price), but that’s not given for every product, but more importantly it’s exactly what it sounds like; a suggestion. There’s no governing body to make sure stores are in line with MSRP.

      • LetMeEatCake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they concluded that they could raise prices to increase profit, they’d do so regardless of theft rates. Those are separate issues.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well… I suppose they’d have to lose more than minimum wage… in my state that would be ~$14/hr. Let’s call it 20/hr because of benefits and incidental cost of staffing.

      Do your part! (/s)

    • FierroGamer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where I’m from you still have to go through someone who makes sure all of the shit in your cart is in your receipt, it adds like 30-60 seconds and it’s a single employee for six checkouts.

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know Costco and Walmart do that. The majority of normal grocery stores around me do not. That’s one reason I rarely go to Costco or Walmart. With Costco they have cashiers as well, so it seems like they don’t need to have the 2nd person. It feels like they assume customers are criminals until proven otherwise.

        • FierroGamer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Criminal until proven otherwise for checking that you didn’t miss anything in your cart? That’s extreme, people do make mistakes, if you actually want to steal you can still pocket stuff, the employee likely won’t give two shits since that’s a job for a security guard like it’s always been.

          If you’re paranoic about being perceived as a potential criminal that’s fine, you do you, but labeling any sort of basic control as an accusation is not cool, might as well label the presence of a security guard as such.

          • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            At Costco they have cashiers and they have your cart and verify it’s empty/everything was scanned. I’m not really sure what the 2nd check is for, other than wasting time.