• Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          No worries! We’re working on that, too!
          Melting the ice caps shifts mass, and therefore, gravity, away from the largely unpopulated poles and nearer to where the people live.

          But this problem will not solve itself with any one solution. We must also petition our government to act now to stage a mission to nudge the asteroid into earth’s orbit! With modern science, we can do this.
          I believe in humanity’s power to defeat humanity!

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Gonna take a bit more than a nudge. Even if we put it on a collision course, it would only be travelling ≈ 17,000 kph, on impact. Barely even moving in intrastellar space. That’s only 0.0000157024 times C. We’d need to get it moving to at least 0.0001 C to get it to be a world killer, maybe even 0.001 C. So somehow we need to figure out how to get the thing moving at ≈ 170,000 kph to ≈ 1,700,000 kph for it to have enough energy to be a world killer. Right now it’s a measly little one megaton explosion.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      A large enough impulse could knock it onto an impact trajectory in 2028. “Large enough” would be absolutely gigantic though, and we have to catch up with it, making it quite impractical. It would be cheaper to just build some more multi-megaton nukes for the same effect.

        • LostXOR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s for changing the trajectory of the 2032 encounter by a few thousand km, not changing the 2028 encounter by 8 million km. And if we’re changing the 2032 encounter we can smack it as it goes by in 2028 instead of playing catch-up before then.

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The one mentioned above is 2024 YR and is slated to pay a visit in 2032. The 2028 one is 1997 XF11, and poses no risk.
        (But I was confused, too - I only looked up because of the 2028/2032 discrepancy. I made a joke to my wife about emailing a state senator and suggesting they fund a mission to knock the asteroid into earth, so that they can help their constituents by ensuring that they no longer have a state to be a senator over. 2028 is during their term, and god willing, 2032 won’t be.)

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      What’s up with the school shooter mentality? You know that if you want to die you can just kill yourself and don’t need to take bunch on innocent people with you?

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        A massive reduction of human life in earth would have insanely positive benefits for the future of human kind and life on earth.

        Just quantifiable proveable net benefits.

        Those facts are uncomfortable, but it would dead end a lot of much worse outcomes

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is a city killer, not a continent killer. Wishing for few hundred thousand innocent people to die is just pure evil - it has no effect on overpopulation.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              Owls and rabbits aren’t the ones burning fossil fuels. Since I was born, 74% of the animals have gone.

              Yeah, overpopulation is long past, we’re at apocalyptic now.

              • Bizzle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Sounds like a capitalism overconsumption problem more than population

                • shalafi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  JFC you’re a child. Who do you think is doing all the consuming? Hint: It ain’t rabbits.

                  • Bizzle@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I’m so grown up that I don’t have to resort to slinging insults. Obviously it’s humans doing the consumption. I’m saying that 1, overpopulation has been a eugenicist talking point forever; and 2, that cold blooded, infinite growth, profits-over-planet consumerism is what makes our society unsustainable, not necessarily the population.

            • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Well, it’s a problem that will solve itself. Most estimates say that the world’s popularion will peak around 2080 and start to decline after that.

                • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  More a result of countries managing to get over the industrial revolution population spike, and getting into the modern age. Once you have access to modern medicine, and the birth mortality and child mortality rates plummet, people stop having so many kids.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              It’s currently moving at about 12,000 kph and will be slightly sped up to 17,000 kph if it actually hits us. That is not a significant enough portion of C to be anything but a city killer. This thing isn’t even a Tsar Bomba in terms of energy output. More like a Mark 17.

              • Jarix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                https://lemmy.world/comment/15180729

                Regrub just said can we make it go faster, so i guess it would need to be increased much much more than 17,000 kph, which seems slow for galactic/cosmic speeds.

                Wonder how much more energy it would need.

                Someone get Randal Monroe on this stat!

                Lol

                • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I think you’d need to nearly double the velocity for it to be remotely close. I think I saw something like 30-40k km/h before it’s at that level

        • Nanook@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Y’all don’t have loved ones? Just kill like 2700 billionaires and the world is a better place already. Fun fact, all dear leaders are on the same list.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Can we strap a bunch of spacex rockets to it to achieve the needed speed? Probably not but the irony would be great