• Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think this is largely untrue. The public might have slightly left-wing views when it comes to the economy and state services, but I’d stake any money that if it was remotely feasible to build a net down the middle of the English channel to keep out the small boats, they’d be clamouring for it.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      The bully has continuously won the last 500 years or so and it was us (especially the us in the UK). But we have some redemption to do and should try to be on the good side of history for once.

    • albert180@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That’s not a really good point. Most people would love to get rid of those Nazis, People loving to play the eternal victim role, and being a drag on our economy

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The United States sucks ass right now. Please, by all means, take charge without us.

    Signed,

    A resident of the United States

  • natarey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Americans were always a bunch of evil, self-interested bastards — all that’s changed is they’ve stopped pretending otherwise.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fine, but such a result isn’t exactly surprising with a leading question like that 🙄

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Its not really an either or question, and if you explicitly want to ask that you should do so by asking something like “Should the UK support Ukraine against the objections of the US?” Or something concrete like that.

        The way the current question is asked leads to the answer as expected as “support” is positively connotated and “maintain good relations” is ambigous and doesn’t make the contradiction clear, hence people opting for the feel good answer of supporting Ukraine.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          It is an either/or question, because the US government does not support Ukraine any more and will condemn any country that does.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That’s my point. The original question is not a real either/or question. It’s a leading question that pretends to be either/or.

            Edit: looking at the down votes I think some people here really need to practise their reading comprehension.