Like:

People should be allowed to exist

Social programs aren’t communism

The system isn’t working for the people

Edit:

I’ve changed my mind on this.

Let the DNC go full MAGA and when they lose, because they will lose, they get the heat and we can eject them forever. At least sit them in a corner.

Progressives, you fight if you want but I don’t believe the elections will be fair so it’s a win win for you.

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Apparently (according to some random comment on Reddit where this was posted) this was written by an organization called “Third Way”, that doesn’t actually have influence in the government or either political party

  • Navarian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “So it turns out veering gradually to the right just isn’t working for us, it’s probably the ‘far left’s’ fault”

    I knew as a European that the US only had two right wing parties, with the democratic party sitting firmly to the right of most of our centrist parties here, but this is just fucking stupid.

  • twocupsofsugar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I don’t understand, so their goal is to shift from centrists to conservatives? What is even happening right now?

  • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is the Ratchet effect in action. Democrats did not heed the warnings about extremist right-wing propaganda spreading like wildfire. They now assume the voter basis is inherently fascist, and race to appease them.

    Democrats are equally to blame for things, like the modern racist slave trade that is the “corrections” system. This puts them with the camp of critical-race-theory enemies. Many of them are transphobic as-fuck, which also puts them (partly) in the anti-gender camp.

    I did not cite genocide and war-crimes in the above paragraph, because so many of you have made clear you are fine with it.

    Centrists have made it clear, time and again, that they value middle-of-the-road fallacy above human lives, and they are willing to put those lives on the line to reifytheir trolley problem fetish. The centrist is someone who will literally say to Hitler “I will defend to the death your right to express your hate” and at the same time say to the trans woman “I will have to reduce your freedom of expression, because it is unpopular with my voter base, and we risk devolving into fascism”.

    This is how we got here. These mfers come every 4 years begging for leftist and anarchist votes, because the alternative is fascism. But they were themselves fascist the whole time, only with a broader social support. Now they lose that broader social support because 10 years of relentless, ludicrously funded propaganda have shifted the discussion 100 years back, they now bend over backwards to earn that social support again. This in unscrupulous.

    In turn, it lends legitimacy to neofascism and shifts the institutional landscape even further. We should not concede one inch to anyone trying to water down human rights for political gain. Human rights are to be taken as a whole, especially at the times that the most illiterate and unnuanced fragile white masculinity reclaims racism, homophobia, transphobia and ableism with renewed confidence, this is not the time to let them score popularity points.

    In fact, we need to escalate. The more we trigger the fascist voter base the better. Destroy the common sense, of the equal-opportunity capitalism apologist social democrat.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Look everyone! Words! in a meme! It has to be true! Get your pitchforks fellow leftists! The meme said we hunt tonight!

  • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    How influential are these moderates at this point? If the DNC leadership is still paying attention to them, they are pants on head retarded.

    Leftwing people don’t fucking vote in primaries. People don’t vote third party enough for it to act as anything but a spoiler benefiting fascists. Realistically the US military would turn people into a bloody paste if we attempted to rebel.

    And now we might not even get elections in the future because we have authoritarians in charge ripping the functions and institutions of the government itself to shreds. Like… we are so fucking screwed.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They’re influential because the big donors like this stuff, it’s the kind of changes that don’t impact them and push away more left leaning policies that would hurt them. One of the points is literally ignoring small donors which is what average people are.

  • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Love America, stop letting extremists speak for us, get involved with regular people, foster community, and govern better. The democrats might have a chance after all.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Far-left is the “fuck you” solution that the left would take. In other words, Bernie Sanders. They should just let that man speak.

    • Kaput@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Calling Bernie Sanders fart left… first thing the American people should do is reframe your left right references. The guy is centre-left. Democrat party is solid right and Republicans are radical far right.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Our Overton Window has been pushed clear out of the building, shoved into the drainage culvert around back, and it’s slowly drifting downriver and out to sea.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’ve read some people on right-wing comment chains say it’s refreshing that the Overton Window is finally being pushed back to the right. In America.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            This shows how deeply our media bubbles bury segments of our population.

            I’m betting those same people believe that Christians are being driven into the sea and the war on christmas is a real fight that they are losing.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I don’t at all think you were saying this, but just put it out there, he himself isn’t compromised. He’s been a solid dude all along

        He’s just pushing the bare minimum to make the hurt stop. He’s pushing in the correct direction, he just pushes for the most watered down, easy to sell version of things that would still address the core problems

        But ultimately, he is indeed the compromise… It’s the best they’re going to get

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As someone else noted, the right said that, because yeah, they’re going to say that. Here in about two years, they’re going to be saying Hitler and the Confederacy lost their wars because they were too woke. BUT WAIT there’s more! As I understand it, when they gutted the Biden campaign to make it the Kamalampaign, they foisted a bunch of the high-level HRC campaign staff on her, which, if you look at it, explains why so much of the Kamalampaign looks and smells exactly like the Hillary campaign. Of course, when these doofuses lost again, rather than showing a smidge of self-awareness, they promptly gave interviews saying that it’s clearly because they were too far left (socially, specifically, though I wouldn’t be at all shocked to hear that they meant it economically too).

    • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      She lost because the US is mostly misogynistic and racist. 2020 Biden voters who didn’t vote for Harris in 2024 mostly gave as their reason something that could be summarized “That’s too much power to give to a woman”. Harris being a woman was a greater impediment to her win than her being a person of color.

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        16 hours ago

        When google searches for “is Biden still running” spike on election day, it’s kinda hard to swallow “racist and misogynist” as the reason.

        Maybe the electorate really is, but I think we should wait for an election where they don’t run a shambling corpse for the first half, belatedly realize that mistake only when it’s completely undeniable to anyone vaguely paying attention, and forcefully swap him out for the VP that tells union reps to fuck off and goes on television to say “I won’t do anything different from the shambling corpse”

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been saying this for a number of months now you got to kill this party. Abandon it completely. We got to start a new party. We got to start a labor party. A worker party. A party of the people. Whatever we want to call it, but whatever it’s called it’s a party that’s not for the big corporate donors that control the Democratic Party. The Democratic party basically since the late '70s but certainly since the '80s abandoned the people the peoples issues. They’re not coming back.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      So where do we start? Voter registration? That’s easily changeable and easily verifiable information to confront them with.

      After that I’m lost, but you give me a shepherd and I’ll be a sheep lol

    • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I kind of agree, but it needs to be a serious party that proves itself. I wont vote for some joke party that only runs in presidental elections. They need to put in the work and run (and win) in smaller more local elections before i would consider giving my vote.

      Ideally, this party would fill in the gap the republicans left behind after dying.

      For the foreseeable future though, i dont have a choice other than to vote dem

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The system of “parties” and “representation” is a complete joke that’s a root cause of this genocidal empire.

      • deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        That’s not entirely true. We’ve had change-ups in which two parties are THE two parties before. Noteably, the GOP. But it MUST start at the local level. We can’t just wait until the presidential election and then complain about the voting system when all that’s left to be done is act as a spoiler candidate. We have to start now, in our own communities.

        It’s also helpful when there is infighting among factions within one of the big parties. That’s one reason behind the success in getting the GOP off the ground so quickly: they made common cause with like-minded members and currently-sitting politicians of the older, underperforming Whig party. This is especially helpful when moving from local support to state and then federal level support, since you can put the apparatus of the old party to work for the new ideas (this obviously doesn’t mean absorb all the old party, just the ones that are already aligned with your mission).

        The final piece is a central tenant of your platform that is both easy to understand and easy to justify simply based on morals and feels. The GOP had antislavery. We could have anti-oligarchy.

        Edit: There is also another way, though: just take over the already existing party, like what the Tea Party did to the GOP. There are some pros to this, the biggest being the ability to utilize the first past the post voting system to greater advantage and ride on name recognition with the underinformed parts of the base. But there are also some big cons, mainly that the “new” party is still saddled with all the corruption and bullshit within the old party from the get-go and now have to convince voters that they are different and will change things from within. With how the top brass of the Democrats have been processing their loss in November, I’m of a mind that starting from scratch could be more beneficial. Especially since there were a lot of voters that just wanted “change”. I also don’t think that simply having a D next to your name on the ballot will work as well for progressives as having an R next to their names worked for the Tea Party.

      • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Some form of Ranked Choice Voting could save what democracy we have. The fact that the leadership of both parties oppose it so vociferously should be enough evidence for anyone to realize it.