• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    What are you going to train it off of since basic algorithms aren’t sufficient? Past committee decisions? If that’s the case you’re hard coding whatever human bias you’re supposedly trying to eliminate. A useless exercise.

    • Giooschi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      A slightly better metric to train it on would be chances of survival/years of life saved thanks to the transplant. However those also suffer from human bias due to the past decisions that influenced who got a transpant and thus what data we were able to gather.

    • optissima@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah bud, you just authorize whatever the doctor orders are because they are more knowledgable of the situation.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That makes logical sense, but what about the numbers? They can’t go up if we keep spending the money we promised to spend on the 69th most effective and absolutely most expensive healthcare system in the world. What is this, an essential service? Rubes.