Zarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 4 天前GIMP 3.0 Releasedwww.gimp.orgexternal-linkmessage-square207fedilinkarrow-up1960arrow-down13cross-posted to: planetdyne@fed.dyne.orglinux@lemmy.worldfoss@beehaw.org
arrow-up1957arrow-down1external-linkGIMP 3.0 Releasedwww.gimp.orgZarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 4 天前message-square207fedilinkcross-posted to: planetdyne@fed.dyne.orglinux@lemmy.worldfoss@beehaw.org
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·4 天前I couldn’t agree more and I see it everywhere as well. It’s systemic. Which would you choose based on their website? Problem is, people on Lemmy are techies who might actually prefer the Gimp site. But any “normal” person would not.
minus-squareknexcar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 天前Yeah I admit I kind of prefer the Gimp site. Are you saying Lemmy isn’t an accurate random sample of normal people in reality?
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 天前Yes, Lemmy is dominated by people with a certain propensity towards tech. You can’t use Lemmy users as a gauge for what is good UX I would say.
I couldn’t agree more and I see it everywhere as well. It’s systemic.
Problem is, people on Lemmy are techies who might actually prefer the Gimp site. But any “normal” person would not.
Yeah I admit I kind of prefer the Gimp site. Are you saying Lemmy isn’t an accurate random sample of normal people in reality?
Yes, Lemmy is dominated by people with a certain propensity towards tech. You can’t use Lemmy users as a gauge for what is good UX I would say.