• enemenemu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Osmand isn’t cheap to buy and a lot of people pay for it. Where else do you think their money comes from?

    Osmand is slow and too complex on my pixel 9, yet I still use it

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Osmand is slow

      Yeah, rendering speed is atrocious. Organic Map renders much smoother.

    • bonjour@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think I bought it for some 5€ some years ago, osmand+ that is. I thought that was a bargain really. I’ve been using the fdroid one now for a long time, I wanted to donate some more money but they seemed to accept bitcoin only. I’ll have a look if that changed.

      Osmand rules.

      • przmk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s slow in general, they’re not using vector maps like organic maps do. I love what OsmAnd does but it’s definitely slower to render and more sluggish to navigate than other maps on my FairPhone 5.

        • InsertUser@en.osm.town
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          @przmk
          They’re both vector based. Purely from usage it feels like OsmAnd is rerendering everything from scratch every time with little caching. If you pan away and pan back it takes effectively the same amount of time to recreate the previously rendered view as a fresh view. This time seems to increase with addition obfs for “live” updates etc.
          When Organic Maps updates slowly it tends to feel like vector tiles “falling back” to lower zoom until more detail is retrieved.
          @goldfndr

        • goldfndr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Yes and no. OsmAnd tends to have far more details to display — more data to display or filter out. I’m guessing that if you had a smaller rendering file (instruction for painting) along with a smaller obf (less data due to prefiltering), it’d be closer to comparable.

          Edit: The link, which addresses slowness with GrapheneOS not experienced with stock ROM, seems to specifically address the (non-stock) FairPhone too.

        • goldfndr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You enabled exploit protection compatibility mode as mentioned in the link?

          • enemenemu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yes, exploit protection is not responsible for osmands slowness. It could impact startup, but nothing more

            It’s not related to graphene. I’ve seen osmamd being snaily on other flagships as well

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s FOSS and available free on F-Droid. Small app transactions are not paying for that staff list.