• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    Kamala Harris just chooses whatever she thinks will further her career. She chose poorly. She’s just lucky the party was stupid enough to have elevated her to vice president even after her debate performance was so bad that she dropped out before the 2020 presidential race even started. Then the idiotic party elevated her again after Biden (another opportunist piece of garbage who was elevated by the party) was forced to step down after his embarrassing 2024 debate performance was obvious to even deluded party insiders.

  • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It is perfectly fine, in fact it would be incredibly refreshing & welcome, to admit…she was a shitty candidate. Fuck, she was so terribly bad. And Tim Walz was a bad pick, too.

    Everything was fake. Every day it unraveled more. She was caught saying things like, “I am different than Biden, I am not Biden, do not let his presidency reflect on me.” What would you do differently? “Nothing, I wouldn’t change anything.” Okay…so…how are you different if everything Biden did was totally great & you wouldn’t do anything differently?? 🤡 Heavily paraphrased, of course, the convos were more detailed (which only made it worse).

    It’s fine to say Kamala Harris was a cringe candidate. Completely unwanted, unelected, unqualified. Biden bowed out & the DNC shoved her in; there is no logical reason to continue to own her as your candidate & representative. You don’t bring dead babies to Passover. This is an opportunity to rebrand the Democrat Party, to refocus on issues that actually matter. That is to say…if anyone still gives a goddamn about the issues that actually matter.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yeah. The DNC either don’t realise, or refuse to realise, that electing Trump is not in approval of him, but expression of disapproval of the Democratic Party.

  • FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If she wasn’t going to be participating in a genocide, then she maybe could have won

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The Schumer Strategy. They just can’t give it up no matter how many times it fails. (they will try again)

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Sadly there’s a lot of ignorant and stupid voters out there. It’s fun to watch leopards eat their faces as a bitter consolation prize now that we’re in a full-ass fascist hell.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yeah, but Trump does the same. Kamala had better taxes planned for the working class and the poor. Trump also has a very poor track record. You can blame Kamala for not doing it right, but imo the issue is mass disinformation and people being extremily dumb.

  • Civil_Liberty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Lol… it’s because the electorate is a bunch of morons. The DNC knows this, but they underestimate to what extent. They figured they could just bypass the whole election process thing and slide Kamala into the final ticket, but they also figured that people were intelligent enough to know that fascists are bad. America is filled with morons, and this carnival ride is going to come to a screeching halt, crushing a significant number of the riders underneath its rusty undercarriage when it does.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I never felt Harris actually stood for anything. This is easily the first election where I felt all the decisions made by the DNC were hard wrong - and I already thought the DNC fucked everything up when the turned on Sanders - but this time they really chose every bad option they could. A senior citizen that was absolutely having problems (outside the debate performance) and choosing an inclusivity* candidate that really had a checkered past of making climbing the ladder a priority while having no real policy gains or stances. Even in the lead up to everything, the other candidates were all but brushed aside. No real debate over policy or where the country was going.

    She said whatever middle of the road thing needed to be said to appeal to enough people while leveling mealy criticism at best for the real problems, from Israel’s shitty war to attacks worker’s right in the US. We went from a candidate that should have never run again to a candidate that hadn’t given anyone a reason to want her to run at all at the last minute. And that’s awful, especially to lose against trump.

    • I hate to even say it, but the fact is that the DNC wanted to run a black female. They banked on the (I can’t think of the word/name for it - people who want to do things for a minority community, but do so cluelessly, remove agency of the group, disregard the actual needs and culture of the group. Usually modestly wealthy white people making “programs” for minority communities) people to vote for the feel-good of voting a minority person up while not actually thinking that people would have needs and policy concerns that would influence their vote, or their willingness to vote at all. The DNC already had “protect the rich white people” as a top priority. They didn’t think people were smart enough to sense that, and everyone really had a feeling that the Democrats didn’t care about them anymore.

    Edit: found it. It’s “white saviorism” or “white savior complex.”

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This guy’s videos are one of the few things on youtube (other than music videos) I’ll watch sometimes.

        • okmko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah it’s pretty well researched. It’s kind of jarring viewing these videos now because they describe a time when fascists weren’t nearly so overt.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        That’s an interesting video, and I don’t think it defines exactly what I was trying to say, but it absolutely is tangential to it.

        I want to say White Paternalism, where white people think they know what is best for minority groups, but that name often has an association with racism.

        Edit: found it: “white saviorism”

        • okmko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Ah, saviorism. Yeah that’s definitely what you’re describing.

          I guess what the video is describing is yeah tangential and/or like a superset. Groups high on the power structure use those who’re lower as proxies for their vying for power/resources/etc.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yes, the video definitely suggests groups can be used as pawns and virtue signaling for those trying to “help” or use the appearance of it to further an agenda.

  • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I see a lot of these postmortems and I don’t know what combination of them is the actual truth, but I wasn’t the slightest bit surprised when she lost. As soon as she got the nomination I thought it was likely.

    For what it’s worth, here is my take on her as one Californian that’s had to deal with her since before 2010 when she ran for attorney general:

    • Even before she ran for attorney general, I was constantly hearing about all kinds of awful stuff the SF district attorney’s office was doing under her leadership even though I’m not from SF county.
    • I was very disappointed when she got the nomination for attorney general because I didn’t want her policies applied statewide. I voted against her in the primary but of course I held my nose and voted for her over the R in the general.
    • I don’t recall who I voted for in the 2016 primary for Senate but it wasn’t her, or blue dog Sanchez. I think I barely tilted toward Sanchez in the general but I honestly can’t remember. I was so disappointed in those choices that I didn’t really give a shit. I thought we could do better in California than two conserva-dems, especially with the top-2 primary system.
    • Never even considered voting for that cop in a presidential primary.
    • Didn’t like that she was the bottom of the ticket in 2020 especially considering Biden’s age, but the alternative was clear.
    • Of course, due to the alternative I voted for her in 2024 but without one iota of enthusiasm. I think I may have been more enthused to vote for John fucking Kerry, but that was a long time ago, it’s hard to remember my feelings for a block of wood.

    A small silver lining to her losing is I’ll never have to hold my nose and vote for her ever again.

    She lost because she just sucks. Whether an individual’s reason for thinking she sucks and not being excited about her was based on misogyny, racism, her record of public service, her policy goals, or her personality doesn’t matter. I didn’t know anybody excited to vote for her. I knew some people excited to vote for a WOC, but not her as a person. A little enthusiasm was what was needed to turn the tide in the three states that mattered this time.

    As soon as Biden dropped out too late for an actual primary, we already lost.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      LMAO drop the act, you and all Dems know that if they run her again you WILL VOTE for her, no matter what

      Until the Dem party tells you to vote someone else

      • blarth@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I would vote for even your overused waifu themed cumsock over any MAGA candidate, so yes. Yes I would.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    She tried to dance to the middle when Trump had a stranglehold on his cult of voters. Really stupid.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’m pretty tired of people nagging voters to follow the rules the framing they set forth. Trolley problem, “voters dont get to decide where the middle is”, etc.

          • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            We do have other options, but I don’t think they are realistic. Mass obstructive protests will probably push the DNC closer to the right (granted I could be wrong about this, but we are talking about a very out of touch and clueless institution of what amounts to be another ruling class) or violence which I do not think anyone in the country is truly ready for despite what everyone says.

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              Why should we be agonizing about what they will do instead of making them ask what we will do? We’ve turned the power dynamic around. What we need to band together and let them know that we wont vote for any of them if they continue with the sellout shenanigans on many fronts. No more deals. No more assumption that the dem brand means they are on our side.

              And we cant just play chicken with them, we have to mean it. If they dont come to us and earn your vote, then dont settle for whatever 99% republican drivel they try to serve us. This isnt a negotiation with the rich, its us deciding if the dems will even exist anymore as a party.

              No more “vote blue no matter who”. They just use that to ream us. That “D” needs to mean what we make it mean, not what they tell us they want it to mean. Thats exactly how we ended up supporting some theocracy’s dirty war crimes.

              From now on I dont give the dems my vote by default. They earn it, and if I dont know their policies, I wont assume they are good.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I’m pretty far left of Harris ideologically and never really liked her or thought she was worthy of these powerful offices. I also never really expected that much from her. That being said, I was passionate about dropping Biden and supporting her campaign even at that late hour, given the immense implications of electing trump for a second term. I donated money, and rallied friends and family to get on board. Then she did that DNC speech and talked about the ‘strongest military’ yadda yadda yadda. All of that energy and enthusiasm instantly evaporated. Nothing she or her campaign did after that motivated any active support from me and I had to really fight off the urge to not vote for her. I’m entirely done with the Democratic Party as run by the current regime. Unless that party reforms, the US is absolute toast.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well said, I had the exact same thought experience, and I am at the exact same conclusion.

  • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I blame on dnc. They should not exist. We already have republican party if we need to vote for a party that works for billionaires. Unless AOC or Bernie, this country is doomed.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Yes, the Democratic Party is more subtle in regard to their support for oligarchs and corruption. With exception to Senator Sanders, the old coots should fucking retire. The election loss proved the AmeriKans are sucking down the Orange Kool-Aid and want the US Constitution to burn.