When you see something has too much up or down votes, does this change your point of view? Also how many people hides votes and etc?

Edit: also is there any eay yo disable scores like 100%😀 in voyager for lemmy?

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    There are only two things I think about when it comes to vote count:

    1. if I make a joke, and it’s not being replied to but being downvoted I want to know if people understood the joke, understood it even was a joke, or if the joke was just not funny.

    2. If I see a question being asked that doesn’t appear to be in bad faith being downvoted, and not answered, it pisses me off.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      One thing I hope everyone takes from reddit, the troll’s main weapon is downvoting in droves. I’ve seen 6 upvotes happen in under a minute on Lemmy and we don’t have that kind of user base. Some posts don’t even get federated that quickly. If the question was in good faith and downvoted, it was probably trolls. I hope you don’t take that personal.

  • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    It depends, once I got like 20 upvotes and it was amazing to think them at 70% of Lemmy users read and agreed with my post!

  • anon6789@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 days ago

    It lets me feel like my time here is being useful if I get the upvotes. I try to limit myself to positive/fun/helpful posts or adding additional facts from other articles to someone’s post of I feel more info is needed to get a full story, so if people reply or at least upvote, it feels like it was worth adding my contribution. If my humor/help isn’t needed or wanted in a place, I don’t want to both waste my time and annoy people.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 days ago

    Not really. Someone will disagree with me eventually, but that doesn’t mean I’m interested in debating or earning their approval somehow.

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 days ago

    They’re helpful to determine the general community’s take on something, even if there is little other engagement.

    And if I’m being honest, getting upvotes is a sweet hit of dopamine. But I try to keep things in perspective.

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 days ago

    I only care when I’m making a post, to help judge how people liked it. I don’t pay attention to points inside threads really.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Yes, but actually no. Upvotes are are similar to seeing someone’s smile or nodding in agreement. Downvotes are like a dead stare or shaking their head in disagreement.

    If someone else is downvoted but seems to have posted in good faith or as a joke it means there is probably something I am missing. Maybe they are serious when I think it is a joke, or there is some context that is news to me.

    If I have a commwnt that is downvoted significantly (like ten or more down than up, or only down) then I double check to see if I was unclear or maybe a joke didn’t land. Mostly to make sure my intent came though.

    If I clarify something and people just don’t agree with it because they don’t see the same nuance then I do think about it a but and come back later to see if maybe I was wrong or everyone else is a dumbass. Most of the time it is me not being clear enough. If they are dumbasses, oh well.

    I also feel happy when a good comment gets upvoted to double digits. That is a nice feeling.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Thats not what downvotes are.

      Downvotes aren’t for disagreeing. Its for misinformation, hate speech, etc.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Downvotes are frequently used for disagreement no matter what the intended use is supposed to be. Heck, a lot of the time people assume comments are misinformation when the person voting just disagrees. People often upvote misinformation because they agree with it too.

            But feel free to keep telling yourself that everyone is using votes the way they are ‘intended to be used’ instead of how they are actually used which is ‘I agree that this is accurate and/or find this funny’ or ‘I disagree with the post because it is wrong/contradicts my existing knowledge/is worded insultingly’.

            There seems to be a general agreement that people should avoid communities that promote misinformation instead of downvoting it as well, which I find contradicts the idea of downvoting misinformation being a purpose.

            • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              So you’re saying that people here are dumb and spread misinformation? Interesting. Sounds like we have some educating to do.

    • Omega@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I disagree, downvotes come free but replies are expensive, when downvotes are disabled you instead have replies that debunk you

      You only encourage dogpiling when downvotes are available

  • Zenith@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    No, not at all. When you get a ton of downvotes but zero responses, assuming you didn’t just post literal nonsense, I consider it proof I’m correct and it’s just a truth people don’t like. When you’re wrong people will downvote you and tell you why, which should be a learning experience that a person should be humble enough to accept but just downvotes or responses only attacking you not you points is pure validation you’re speaking an uncomfortable truth

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      And when someone spins up 3 entire instances to create accounts to downvote you, you know you’re right.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t care about the rating on other people’s content. On my own I only care so far as to use it as a guideline for whether I actually was interesting.

    On reddit I was a trolling karma whore, but here? Here I’m much more about engaging with people and getting 3 upvotes tells me that I gave the community something meaningful.

  • psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    When I see someone downvoted for no good reason, I tend to support them; upvotes don’t sway me at all. My own stuff I see votes as a guide to how well I fit a community (except in one controversial group which attracts down votes – there voters are meaningless

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think there should be a “equivocal” vote.

      I think that’s what boost was supposed to be for, or was that just on kbin.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    I use my post/comment history (and saves) as a way to know what threads to go check in on later. And I get a kick out of seeing a lot of upvotes and dislike seeing anything in negative territory. But I don’t have votes in mind when I post.