Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 6 个月前Toxic Masculinitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down134
arrow-up11.3Karrow-down1imageToxic Masculinitylemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 6 个月前message-square111fedilink
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9·6 个月前Really, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·6 个月前It’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 个月前Eh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
minus-squareGloomy@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-26 个月前The Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.
Really, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
It’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
Eh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
The Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.
Tell that to a dildo
Yours can talk?
…yours can’t?