Article is in italian I couldn’t find any news about this in english but i believe it’s really important to share.

"Sono attesi dagli 80 ai 90 aerei all’aeroporto Marco Polo di Venezia. Jet privati da Los Angeles, New York, Londra e Dubai scaricheranno in laguna un carico scintillante di star, imprenditori, supermodelle, influencer e tycoon. Il traffico aereo privato sarà talmente intenso da richiedere un coordinamento speciale tra l’aeroporto di Venezia e gli scali di riserva a Verona e Treviso. "

Translation:

"80 to 90 planes are expected at Venice’s Marco Polo airport. Private jets from Los Angeles, New York, London and Dubai will unload a glittering cargo of stars, entrepreneurs, supermodels, influencers and tycoons into the lagoon. Private air traffic will be so intense that it will require special coordination between Venice airport and the reserve stopovers in Verona and Treviso. "

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    He will cheat on her while she does the pool boy. It’s the new/old thing for the rich.

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      “I’m not super familiar with the lifestyles of the rich and famous. What, exactly, does a pool boy even do?

      “Uhhhh… The wife.”

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is where God gets to prove he’s real, and he’s on the side of the people. If it’s true, Venice will finally sink into the sea and become a legend, like Atlantis.

    If that happens, I’ll finally go to church every Sunday. Hear me God? That’s what it will take.

    • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It will be sad for all the art and historical artifacts. But (the) god(s) can make the funniest entertainment for them and the world

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ll go with you.

      I’m still going to want to have a hard talk with God about why She allows cancer babies and such…

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is exactly why I don’t feel guilt about my statistically insignificant contribution towards climate change.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I wonder how many jet flights do a single year of collective paper straw using offsets

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        according to this wiki article, over its lifetime a plastic straw will release 1,46 grams of CO2, while a paper straw will release 1,38 grams of CO2. that’s a saving of 0,08 grams.

        and according to this article, a private jet releases 4,9 kilograms of CO2 per mile.

        so: assuming you are using one straw per day, a year of using paper straws instead of plastic straws offsets about 0,006 miles of one private jet, or a bit more than 10 meters.

        that’s fun.

        • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          tbh, the real reason to use paper straws instead of plastic is that they’re much more biodegradable, not so much the CO2 use. we should use way less plastic in general, imo

          and it bears mentioning that the CO2 released by private jets still pales in comparison to what the airline industry produces; the average global northerner’s overseas holiday is still very destructive for the environment (tho obviously not as much as a rich fuck using a private jet)

          • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            If you compute it per person I suspect a billionaire is probably producing (just due to flights) about 10000 to 50000 more than an average traveller (couple international flights a year).

            • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              To be honest the planet does not care how you compute it.

              Quick google-fu said private jets are about 1,8% of the total airtravel pollution. If you want whats good for the earth, focus on the half empty and empty commercial flights that big airlines do because they want to keep their hangar places. That makes much bigger part of the overall pollution.

              I say: let the rich fly, just make it so they pay enough taxes for it compencate for it.

              • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Oh no I am fully on board with this. But it still boils to the same source of governments serving the interest of the rich rather than the remaining people. Airplane companies pushing agendas and asking for government incentives while governments say they really care about the planet but not making enough effort to make train travel cheaper (international per mile especially) than flying. Fucking hell they should incentivize the hell out of it so that it becomes cheap as chips and people take flights only for long distances. So yes commercial flights are definitely also a part of the problem.

              • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                The planet does not care about taxes either.

                The reason per person footprint is important because we can’t just turn off all pollution. We have to gradually reduce it.

                You can’t just say to your country “by the way, we just banned fossil fuels”, that will just result in you dead and a pro-pollution guy being in charge of the country next day.

                The way to reduce pollution is to get more output from the same input. That is, efficiency.

                Private jets are incredibly inefficient and are used by an extremely low percentage of the population. There’s no reason to keep that 1.8% just to satisfy 0.0001% of the population.

                • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Just to walk you trough my reasoning.

                  Change needs money. That 1,8% can generates lots of money that can be used to fight pollution in other ways. We could easily rise the taxation and that 1,8% could turn in to 1,5% or something.

                  If we start to ban private jets conpletelly by changings laws, it will be long process and even if one country bans it there will always be poor countries or tax heavens that will find a way to enable it. It will turn in to a game of aviation wack-a-mole and the gran price of that work will be 1,8% reduce in emission.

                  On the other hand we could make bigger impact from commercial side while not losing tax revenue as much. Its hard to get real numbers but its likely ghost flights alone are close to same pollution as private jets, not to mention that average commercial flights has only 80% of the seats filled.

                  So my thinking in short is that any impact with banning private jets is dwarfed by anything done in the commercial side.

                  And im not saying private jets are good. Im against those. People just need to understand that they are very minor part of the aviation pollution.

        • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well I am glad I can buy a CEO 10 meters of flight time. My estimates is that our collective world wide yearly efforts can just about earn our top 100 richest turds their annual flight pollution.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    238
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    But hey, we should do the right thing, save the environment and buy his ev truck!

    • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Don’t forget to turn off the lights (those LED lights that consumes practically nothing), and recycle (but forget that recycling companies do not actually recycle anything).

      As for that EV, it seems an easy way to shame poor people who cannot afford it.

      Every time, this world feels like a big joke. Once I retire, I’ll get a cabin in the woods and forget about all this.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        A woman with an idea who took funding from bezos.

        Her choice.

        My choice is to not have anything to do with bezos, as much as I humanly can. And that includes not buying products he will profit from.

    • shiroininja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Sucks that a small frame single cab pickup truck has to comeback under Bezos, because it is the perfect example of a sane size and price truck, but being attached to Bezos and electric only kills it for me. I was super interested until I did research on the company. I really wish they’d bring back the tiny (by today’s standards) Toyota trucks with the full size bed. Like the mid 90s Tacoma with no lift

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        My first car was a Toyota Tacoma. I miss that thing. The bed was low so you didn’t have to kill your back, too.

        And for all those “I use it for my job” types, they’d have more use out of a freaking transit connect.

        When SUVs became “family vehicles”, instead of the dick-compensation-machines, marketing said “ahah! Big trucks!” And now big trucks are the dick compensation machines.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Wait he has an ev truck now too?? Is this part of the douchebag checklist? Space company, ev truck, …

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        So that if Trump goes after 4 years and is replaced back by a democrat he is going to turn back to democrat voters and tell them “look I sent women to space, I am super into environmental issues and I actually was a big fan of DEI so I am implementing them back again”. For him it is just hedging bets.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It was the British that sent their criminals to Australia.

        /s

        • Welt@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          They sent them to North America first. The charting and colonisation of NSW happened shortly after the US declared independence, not a coincidence. Of course now the inbred aristocracy doesn’t run this place any more so you can keep your worst thanks

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    All the Sociopathic Oligarchs in the same place at once? Look, I’d normally be against this sort of thing, but if someone wants to drop a nuke on Venice, I could excuse it just this once.

  • Ileftreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    It would be a shame if something were to happen to so many billionaires gathered conspicuously in one place on a very publicized date

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s why they picked Italy, Italy loves fascism

      • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        Italy is also home of the people who responded to that regime by dragging Mussolini and his wife’s bodies after their assassination across the country back to Milan, where they were unceremoniously dumped in a town square to be humiliated and desecrated, then hung on girders above a service station in the square by their ankles until they fell and subsequently were buried in unmarked graves.

  • snf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    unload a glittering cargo of stars, entrepreneurs, supermodels, influencers and tycoons into the lagoon

    If only that were literally true