IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前[Video] BBC cuts away during pro-Palestine musicians Kneecap. The followup act Bob Vylan invents a new chant on live TVi.imgur.comvideomessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up1664arrow-down122
arrow-up1642arrow-down1video[Video] BBC cuts away during pro-Palestine musicians Kneecap. The followup act Bob Vylan invents a new chant on live TVi.imgur.comIndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前message-square127fedilink
minus-squareentwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down4·5 个月前If your sample is heavily biased, then the data from it is worthless.
minus-squareentwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·5 个月前Nah, I’m not going to argue science and statistics with someone who clearly understands neither.
minus-squarenjm1314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·5 个月前Going through these comments you’ve not presented one scientific or statistical argument. You’re basically going on vibes.
minus-squareentwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·5 个月前I’ve only responded to you twice. Once to tell you that a biased sample set provides garbage data, and again to tell you I wouldn’t be arguing with someone who didn’t understand the core concepts of the conversation. The vibes thing is quite the projection, though.
minus-squarenjm1314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·5 个月前Considering this is the first time you’ve responded to me at all I think maybe I don’t trust your ability to judge Core Concepts of a conversation.
minus-squarepaultimate14@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·5 个月前The beautiful irony here is that you are believing in and spreading IDF propaganda for them.
Removed by mod
If your sample is heavily biased, then the data from it is worthless.
Removed by mod
Nah, I’m not going to argue science and statistics with someone who clearly understands neither.
Going through these comments you’ve not presented one scientific or statistical argument. You’re basically going on vibes.
I’ve only responded to you twice. Once to tell you that a biased sample set provides garbage data, and again to tell you I wouldn’t be arguing with someone who didn’t understand the core concepts of the conversation.
The vibes thing is quite the projection, though.
Considering this is the first time you’ve responded to me at all I think maybe I don’t trust your ability to judge Core Concepts of a conversation.
The beautiful irony here is that you are believing in and spreading IDF propaganda for them.