NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoSpecial Moon Landing Operation Successlemmy.worldimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1710arrow-down113cross-posted to: spaceflightmemes@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1697arrow-down1imageSpecial Moon Landing Operation Successlemmy.worldNonCredibleDefense@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square32fedilinkcross-posted to: spaceflightmemes@sh.itjust.works
minus-squarejustdoit@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up80·1 year agoCan we take a moment to appreciate the very real possibility that the Soviet space program of the 50s would have been able to land a lunar probe better than the current Russian program? (Obligatory /s, space is hard and shit goes wrong sometimes)
minus-squareRhaedas@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up44·1 year agoSpace is hard. The Moon surface is harder. Sorry.
minus-squaretetraodon@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·edit-21 year agoIt’s called lithobraking
minus-squaremnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoThey don’t call it hard vacuum for nothing
minus-squareИльдар@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoIn USSR there were 16 successful and 17 unsuccessful missions to moon Yes it hard, its a rocket science
minus-squareoatscoop@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-21 year agoWell, the Soviet space program of the 70s did put landers on the moon.
minus-squareRemavas@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoForget the moon, the USSR put probes on Venus (the Venera missions).
minus-squareTechmaster@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoIn Soviet Russia the space probe IS the surface of the moon!
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·1 year ago50s ussr was driven by personal ambition for position in a totalitarian society. No ambition is allowed in Russia now
Can we take a moment to appreciate the very real possibility that the Soviet space program of the 50s would have been able to land a lunar probe better than the current Russian program?
(Obligatory /s, space is hard and shit goes wrong sometimes)
Space is hard.
The Moon surface is harder.
Sorry.
It’s called lithobraking
They don’t call it hard vacuum for nothing
In USSR there were 16 successful and 17 unsuccessful missions to moon Yes it hard, its a rocket science
Well, the Soviet space program of the 70s did put landers on the moon.
Forget the moon, the USSR put probes on Venus (the Venera missions).
In Soviet Russia the space probe IS the surface of the moon!
50s ussr was driven by personal ambition for position in a totalitarian society. No ambition is allowed in Russia now