• penguin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It just comes down to whether or not the fuel saved is worth more than the sail maintenance. Hopefully it is.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Plus there’s that whole destroying the planet thing. Not sure if that’s included as a cost.

      Bunker fuel on cargo ships is one of the biggest contributors to climate change. The damage they do is immense.

      • ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        We should just tax bunker fuel up to a point where it’s a bit cheaper to run sails… Only if we had a planet wide universal accord on it

      • Etterra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        The shareholders don’t care about the planet tomorrow when not caring today is profitable. That’s how the system works - by design.