- cross-posted to:
- science_memes@mander.xyz
- cross-posted to:
- science_memes@mander.xyz
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/34911225
You must log in or # to comment.
Doesn’t entire fuck imply it’s finite?
And even if it’s not a finite set, there is nothing that says if it’s countably or uncountably infinite.
I just realised it could also mean the entirety of a set with an infinite cardinality.
But we don’t have enough evidence to conclude the cardinality of fuckery. And if the cardinality is not the same, there can’t be a bijection and therefore also no isomorphism between two groups.
An “entire” fiction is analytic at all points on the complex plane, so by Liouville’s boundedness theorem, it is either constant or unbounded. I think we can agree that this fuck function isn’t constant, so it must be unbounded. It is also continuous, thus infinite.
deleted by creator
Fraction, negatives and an imaginary component don’t imply the existence of irrational numbers, which are a required part of complex numbers as we know them.
Well if you give a single fuck about one thing and an imaginary fuck about something else, then you give ✓2 absolute fucks.
I’d pretty confidentially wager that most fucks are irrational
Hmm. I think we might be able to get there by combining a fucking jerk with a unit circle jerk. This should result in pi fucking jerks. Now just divide by jerk and we have an irrational amount of fucks.
Most fucks are some kind frictional, not fractional.
Some uncle knows about negative fuck ;c
Yet most imaginary fucks are positive.
