“This ban is a massive win for Texas ranchers, producers, and consumers,” Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller said in a statement following the bill’s passage. “Texans have a God-given right to know what’s on their plate, and for millions of Texans, it better come from a pasture, not a lab. It’s plain cowboy logic that we must safeguard our real, authentic meat industry from synthetic alternatives.”

Texas joins Indiana, Mississippi, Montana and Nebraska in enacting new laws this year; Alabama and Florida did so last year. In March, the Oklahoma House approved a similar bill that did not advance out of the Senate this session.

  • pheggs@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I mean, I am all in for labeling, but banning it? Is that what’s happening? why would anyone do that

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If the meat companies had any sense, they’d be pushing for and funding it. That much moneyh and not owning the competition is just flat out stupid.

        • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          That’s the thing. It’s too late for them to get in on the real ground floor. The tech is already basically here with increasingly well established companies. Now the cheapest best optionfor the old meat companies to stay competitive is to try to block the new competition. Of course that method won’t hold up long term but we all know shareholders only care about next quarter.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          Exactly, they would profit more from planting whatever crop is needed to supply raw materials to the lab-grown facility, than the efficiency loss of raising cattle for protien

  • zeca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Call it something else, rebrand it. We could say that if it didnt come from an animal, its not meat, its just a protein cake or a red pudding, or something. Could it avoid the ban this way?

    They didnt ban any vegan protein source, they banned the exact one that tries to make you feel like youre eating beef. The name “Lab-grown meat” tells those ranchers that it wants to replace them, its unnecessarily aggressive, which innevitably creates a reaction.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The SmAlL gOvErNmEnT GOP, playing favorites and legislating in favor of one of the unhealthiest, ecologically devastating industries on the planet… But their voters will keep voting for the corruption!

  • beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Its a zero win. I would have eaten this because I’m vegan. Meat eaters would prefer normal meats. Now I go back to just beans. Fuck rather I won’t even say what I eat. That way the retards leading this stupid Rednoseance won’t ban whatever I plan to eat next. Heck you know what? I’m totally going to eat beef. The most expensive kind of beef and chicken. Yeah! Totally. I’m a vegan and I will go eat the most popular meats out there!

  • xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Lab grown meat is a dead meme imo but acting like Texan beef comes from grass fed cows in pastures and not from hellish factory farms where they get fed corn until their liver dies sure sounds stupid

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Texans have a God-given right to know what’s on their plate

    This sounds a lot like anti-vaxxing, where people want to “know” what’s in their vaccine. Like it’s a conspiracy.

    • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If only Texans could read (labels) they would know instantly. The end of the quote is the real focus: they want to protect the ranching industry by killing competition from plant based products.

    • DarthFreyr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I bet the lab folks could tell you what’s in their product much better than ranchers and meat processing factories ever could. A lot of science goes into it though and some people seem to be allergic to that, at least based on the sorts of claims they make.

      • zeca@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        A scientist telling you the name of every compound of some food doesnt make you actually know whats in it. Theres a big difference between knowing the name and knowing the thing and how it affects your body.

        • amzd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well if it really mimics the real thing it will probably be a type 1 carcinogen too.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    We need to be funding this stuff.

    Move all meat subsidies into lab-grown meat to save animals and still have meat. Easy.

    Everybody trying to act like it’s bad is lying and likes animals getting hurt.

  • lemmylump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    What company do I invest in to support this?

    This will be bigger than legal weed and the idiot states banning it are showing us yet again how fucking stupid they are.

    Edit

    Upside Foods, but ANIC , AGNMF, and CULTF are the investing groups.