FFmpeg
code.ffmpeg.org
FFmpeg
  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.mlEnglish
    3·
    3 hours ago

    I hadn’t heard of Forgejo, although I realize now that I have seen repositories using it before. I think it’s cool that they even have statically linked binaries of it but it’s a bit concerning that like an entire web server is built in because what if there’s vulnerabilities? I guess if you regularly stayed up to date it’s not too bad then.

    Edit: Oh, sounds like it’s a fork of Gitea which I have heard of before, interesting.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.worldEnglish
    81·
    9 hours ago

    I still find the name weird. Let’s do something fun here; Comment what YOU think ForgeJo should be called instead

    • Javi@feddit.ukEnglish
      4·
      6 hours ago

      You sure that the issue is geographical? I’m in the UK and was able to access the site without using a VPN or anything like that.

          • 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.comEnglish
            1·
            1 hour ago

            I haz a vpn thanks. I was just bringing attention to how it is shown yet can’t see it. Schroedingers Post I shall call it

        • Javi@feddit.ukEnglish
          1·
          3 hours ago

          Oh I see what you’re talking about. I thought you meant the link to fffmpegs forgejo site rather than the crosspost link.

          Maybe it’s just the app I’m using, but sync was able to redirect me to the Open source community that this was originally posted to. (It’s hosted on lemmy.ml, but the poster is from Lemmy.zip, which is why the post link is Lemmy.zip).

          When I open via browser though, I see the OSA block that you’re referring too… An interesting difference for sure. But I suppose if all posts from lemmy.zip were blocked, we wouldn’t be seeing this one either, so I’m guessing it’s just post shares that won’t work?

          • 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.comEnglish
            1·
            1 hour ago

            Well it seems that the title is fetched and when you click to visit then it is geoblocked…
            I mean I get the idea, and it is fine (if I wanted to I’d magically move to another country) but it was more a point that federation for geoblocked stuff is kinda borked (not in a bad way)

    • toph@lemmy.worldEnglish
      24·
      14 hours ago

      Probably just the weird name. It makes it feel like someone’s weekend personal project.

      I use it to self-host my own code and it works great, I’m totally moved off GitHub now.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.worldEnglish
      44·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, this is news to me. I think Codeberg runs on Forgejo, and just the other day people were singing its praises when GitHub became part of Microsoft’s AI team. This feels like a sudden shift.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        11·
        4 hours ago

        Another git repository that is not hosted on itself?
        Seems like a weird choice.

        That’s like the CEO from Microsoft going on stage with a MacBook.

        • Electricd@lemmybefree.netEnglish
          4·
          4 hours ago

          Forgejo is developped on Codeberg, which runs on Forgejo

          Codeberg is the “demo” Forgejo instance is where they develop the software (Forgejo)

          Forgejo is a fork of Gitea which is pretty well known. They forked out of fear because Gitea got bought and is now a for-profit iirc

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.worldEnglish
          5·
          5 hours ago

          Codeberg is a service. Forgejo is a platform.

          It’s more like how a warehouse company doesn’t build its own forklifts.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netEnglish
      11·
      19 hours ago

      Personally uaong forgejo myself and it has been smooth sailing for ages! This is the first time ive ever seen people taking a stance against it, though the ones in the comments sidnt seem to have a good argument.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.netEnglish
      1·
      4 hours ago

      Anubis is a PoW open source crawling/DDoS protection

      Directly cloning should still be supported, I hope

    • miridius@lemmy.worldEnglish
      161·
      10 hours ago

      You’re the asshole for expecting an open source project to have to spend all their time supporting every possible niche browser/configuration, rather than spending time building their actual product that people want to use.

    • MHLoppy@fedia.io
      51·
      1 day ago

      Can access fine (with reduced functionality) on my end with JS disabled - maybe you have something else tripping it up or something?

        • techwithjake@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          11·
          19 hours ago

          Seems like something else tripping it up. Just tested with DDG Browser from F-Droid. Passed the bot test, no issues. Did have to reload the page once for it to render properly though. After that, worked just fine. Aggressive DNS ad blocker, maybe?

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldEnglish
            13·
            16 hours ago

            My bad, I should have read the error better (although I could have sworn it was complaining about javascript before, I probably misremember): The actual error is

            Missing feature Cookies

            Still, that is on default settings…

    • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
      33·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah same, I’m on Brave and Anubis is blocking me. Not hating on them for using Anubis though. It is unfortunate that it’s blocking me nonetheless.

      (Inb4 I am told to commit sudoku for using Brave, yes I know the owner sucks)

      • Electricd@lemmybefree.netEnglish
        1·
        3 hours ago

        Same problem here but JS is enabled

        edit: cleared cookies and removed useragent spoofing in brave shields and it seemed to have worked

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        31·
        5 hours ago

        If you know, why still use it?
        Not like theres a bazillion other chrome browsers and you could probably use any other browser (depending on the add-ons you really need)

        • Electricd@lemmybefree.netEnglish
          1·
          3 hours ago

          Because the other browsers have less features, and the other owners suck as well. As for the browser itself, Brave it probably the best chrome-based one out there for desktop