• Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    It is a 5.

    Nothing left to guess. All others can be ruled out with the dots that we actually see.

    2 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the upper left corner.

    3 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the lower left corner.

    7 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the lower left corner.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    that is a 3.

    the 3 above has been cut off as well.

    no other numbers are flat on top and open on the back.

  • underline960@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    The BBD year is 2026 and you’ve already opened the can. Man, if we were roommates and you’d called me downstairs for this…

  • itsathursday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Best before date is not a used by date. You can eat something well after a best before date, it just might not be exactly the same as something “fresh”, but still edible. Used by is when there’s a chance for harm.

    My vote is “3” even though it doesn’t match the 3 above it.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      My vote is to taste and smell the fucking thing. This is what every chef in every kitchen you eat at has always done. That will tell you if it’s edible. BBD is a suggestion, so a few months out of date means wildly different things if it’s been kept at an average of 20c or 30c.

      I’ve tasted shit that was 5 years past BBD. Didn’t taste good, but didn’t cause any harm. Trust your taste and smell to tell you what’s bad. Evolution spent millions of years tuning your senses.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I’d say 3, except that the 3 on the line above has a flat bottom line.

    If it’s also missing some dots from the middle, it could be part of the second and third columns of a 2.

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I still vote for 3.

      The 7 above is also missing some dots on the right, so there’s an entire vertical strip of erased ink. The numbers are up to 5 dots wide, but the existing 3 only has 4 dots on the bottom. It’s possible that a fifth is supposed to be there one spot higher, matching the missing number, but it just got clipped by the erased part.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        That’s a possibility.

        My other argument, though, is that in 2026 February 28 is the end of a month, while March 28 is a random Saturday.

        • radix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          BBD (best by date) is going to be 1 year, or some other legally specified number of days, from the date of manufacturing/canning. It can fall on the end of a month, but not intentionally. 28-Mar-2025 was a Friday.

    • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      58 minutes ago

      Ah yes, I’d say 2 is the most likely candidate

      Edit: I’m on team 3 now thanks to radix’s comment

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Another argument in favor of 2 is that February 2026 has 28 days, so 2 is the only digit that would make the date the end of a month.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    5 or 9, neither of which show up otherwise, so we can’t be quite sure which one matches.

    1, 4, and 7 can be thrown right out as the dots just wouldn’t line up that way. 0, 2, 3, 6, and 8 have other examples in the image that don’t match the dot pattern.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      2 could match if the digit in question is missing dots within the visible columns, and 3 could match if the existing example is missing a leftmost column.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        2 doesn’t match because the top leftmost dot shouldn’t be there. If it’s shifted by a column, then the bottom leftmost dot shouldn’t be there, and the spacing isn’t quite right, either.

        3 doesn’t match because the other example of a 3 doesn’t have a dot in the bottom leftmost dot that’s printed.

        Or the whole thing is a misprint, in which case I don’t think we can even figure it out.

  • Ludrol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I vote for 5 with a lot of missing dots.

    If dots didn’t move (they sometimes do) only five would have flat top and missing corner.

  • iveseenthat@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Those printers have small heads and print (in this case) left to right. Most likely it is not missing dots in the same column, which discards the chance of a 5. I would say it is a 3.

    If you bought more than one can, check the other ones, as most likely they are from the same batch.

    From another angle: who cares! You ate it already, and the BBD year is 2026

  • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’d say 3

    and the 3 that is there is missing a three pixel vertical slice on its left side

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yes but the there is printed like a normal three. The font on a computer screen showing 3 has the left edge of the three arced down. In a can I’ve never seen it arced down.

      • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It doesn’t match the 3 above because the 3 above is also missing some dots. There is a stripe right down the printing that impacts the unknown number and a 7 on the left and the 3 on the right. It cuts the left most curve of the upper 3 off while also cutting the 7.