Meanwhile, readers say that some AI-penned articles switch languages halfway through.

  • superkret@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the workforce democratically decides to keep people employed whose job can be done cheaper by AI, that company will not survive in the long term.
    So either we as a society decide to artificially keep people in jobs that aren’t needed anymore, or we have to give the labor cost savings to the people instead of the owners.

    Both is not possible under a Capitalist system, so that will have to go.

    • ShadowRam@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      labor cost savings to the people instead of the owners.

      This is the way.

      Profit sharing should be a part of our laws.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have a point, if a democratic workforce votes to increase profit instead of investing in workforce, they will not survive.

      I am thinking it would work more like a non-profit, due to all the money made would be used in reinvesting in the company and paying workers.

      Aren’t some companies artificially kept up or is it manipulation of the market?

      I think the capitalist system is already dead, you need markets for capitalist system.


      Technofeudalism: Explaining to Slavoj Zizek why I think capitalism has evolved into something worse

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ghx0sq_gXK4