• over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      17 days ago

      Nor legal purposes, or basically any serious purposes, unless reviewed very carefully by at least three actual expert humans in the field.

      Nah, fuck that even, fuck AI.

      • finitebanjo@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yeah I was about to say. I MIGHT be able to condone an individual machine running a consistent model if it pays the regular unsubsidized amount for medical schooling, passes all of its classes, and competes with humans for a residency spot. And when I say individual machine I mean no hardware swapping or updates at any time during the process.

        Spoiler alert: that’s lightyears beyond any current capability.

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 days ago

    Can we make it crash!? And never work again?

    In that case I will insisting that my real doctors put as many typos as possible in their reports.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 days ago

    and this is why I refused to use AI when my Dr asked.

    that and how it has a tendency to hallucinate shit.

    could you imagine what kind of treatment you’d get if you records say you’re addicted to meth?