simple@piefed.social to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoNintendo Wins $2 Million Lawsuit Against 'MiG Switch' Distributorwww.nintendolife.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down16 cross-posted to: nintendo@lemmy.world
arrow-up1113arrow-down1external-linkNintendo Wins $2 Million Lawsuit Against 'MiG Switch' Distributorwww.nintendolife.comsimple@piefed.social to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square26fedilink cross-posted to: nintendo@lemmy.world
minus-squarenull@lemmy.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·2 months ago then stealing isn’t piracy anyway. Sometimes stealing is piracy, but pirating digital content is never stealing. It’s copyright infringement.
minus-squareoplkill@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoBy that logic AI don’t steal too
minus-squareGoodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoBut who benefits from intellectual property? Not the artists, paid by the companies, who don’t care about who pirates (at least in video games)
minus-squarenull@lemmy.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoDepends entirely on the particular IP and what’s been negotiated.
Sometimes stealing is piracy, but pirating digital content is never stealing. It’s copyright infringement.
By that logic AI don’t steal too
Correct.
But who benefits from intellectual property? Not the artists, paid by the companies, who don’t care about who pirates (at least in video games)
Depends entirely on the particular IP and what’s been negotiated.