I can see how you could argue that nuclear reactors qualify as clean energy but calling natural gas green is just ridiculous. Might as well call a diesel generator green energy because it creates less emission than burning lignite.
idk why the EU is such a shitshow, it’s one bad news after another
On the curve, they’re still doing well.
You’ve, uh, seen America, right?
Lol. For real. Shit is dark over here. I WISH we could label anything other than coal and oil as clean energy. N But no, saving the planet is gay or something. Gotta own the libs. Fascism is fun.
Eeech.
It’s better than coal and oil. People shit the bed because of 2 big events that happened to old reactor types which were susceptible to such errors.
Honestly, would you rather live in a world where nuclear and gas are used to transition or coal and oil? Wind and solar still can’t power all of Europe 24/7. Solutions are being worked on, tested, and built, but in the meantime, I’ll sleep better with coal and oil centrals being replaced by nuclear. They will use less space, provide more stable power, and serve as a fine transition until the storage issue has been solved.
Of course subsidies for coal and oil should be phased out ASAP, but let’s not paint a pure coal and oil transitional period as better.
You can’t just replace coal and oil by nuclear power. it takes decades to build a new plant and is very expensive. Money that is better spend in investing in wind and solar.
Nuclear is needed for stable base load, in significant quantity as well. And the argument of they take years doesn’t hold water, in fact its more the reason to start now.
The global-average build time is 6-8 years.
No-one is saying “stop building solar and wind”. Nuclear is for transitioning and should’ve been built 10-20 years ago, but now is also a good time.
Natural gas can be green, if it’s biomethane. Nuclear though…
“Natural gas” can never be green because it is specifically fossil-fuel gas.
If you’re harvesting methane from landfills, that’s actually green since burning it reduces the greenhouse gas effects. But that’s only like 0.1% of the methane used
Yeah, that’s the kind of natural gas I was talking about, but it seems that it comes down to how you define words.
That is green gas. It isn’t green “natural” gas, because “natural” is exclusively the fossil fuel stuff. Stupid naming, probably some 19th century marketing thatfor some reason stuck.
Edit: 19th, not 18th.
Ah, probably the same weirdness that lead to large gas storage vessels being called gasometers
Nuclear can be green, if its a breeder reactor. Natural gas though…
