• k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It was probably made during an argument between a European and a Texan to demonstrate how far an average Texan must to drive to get to their nearest grocery store and why high-speed rail just won’t work in the US.

  • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I wanted to say “[citation needed]”, this seems to be straight from Wikipedia (which it is, it’s the last paragraph of the “File format” section).

    Unfortunately there’s no clear basis for this information, except a reference to the (entire) “PDF Reference”.

    The article image is essentially identical, but it’s not the same and must have been remade at some point. I wonder if the wiki editor lives at the centre of the square?

    • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      From the reference document:

      “Implementation limits”, p. 991ff:

      PDF itself has one architectural limit: Because ten digits are allocated to byte off-sets, the size of a file is limited to 1010 bytes (approximately 10 gigabytes).

      and

      The minimum allowed page size is 3 by 3 units in default user space; the maximum is 14,400 by 14,400 units. […] Beginning with PDF 1.6, the size of the unit may be set on a page-by-page basis; the default remains at 1/72 inch. (See implementation note 177 in Appendix H.)

      That implementation note, by the way, roughly states that “the UserUnit entry of the page dictionary” is more or less a dimension multiplier, and that:

      Acrobat 7.0 supports a maximum UserUnit value of 75,000, which gives a maximum page dimension of 15,000,000 inches (14,400 * 75,000 * 1 ⁄ 72).

      and

      The magnification factor of a view is constrained to be between approximately 8 percent and 6400 percent. These limits are not fixed; they vary with the size of the page being displayed, as well as with the size of the pages previously viewed within the file.

      All in all, dealing with a page of such humongous dimensions sounds rather bothersome.

      • bier@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        This only matters if the pdf has a simple square in it. When it’s an actual scale map, with 1cm detail, it will still be a huge pdf even if it’s vectors.

        • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sure. It’s all about the level of detail. An 8-1/2x11" pdf with lots of very small detail that you have to zoom way in to see would also be a very big file.

        • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          True, but that’s independent of the pdf page size. If there’s a 1e12x1e12 complex jpeg image even on a small pdf page, it would still be a huge file.

        • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          It would be small file size and automatically scaled to fit on your screen, just like normal. If you zoom in an insane amount, you’d have huge scroll bars, just like normal.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Probably small. If it just had a single circle at each corner it’s just 4 objects with really far positioning values.

      You could fill it with more stuff to make it bigger, of course