• HatchetHaro@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      very well. i shall now falsely claim rape to murder someone, and since the victim has no way of proving innocence (on account of being dead), they would have lost the right to due process anyways, and then i get away with it scot-free since it is now legal for me to kill my “rapist”.

        • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          oh, no, i’m just massively in support of legally killing anyone i want, so thanks for giving me an easy and legal way to do it!

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          the “false rape agenda” is an incel fascist rhetoric pushed by MRA activists

          Maybe today. But you said you wanted to do away with due process for murder. What do you think due process is?

          Your position here is every bit as ludicrous as Trumpists saying “immigrants don’t deserve due process because they entered the country illegally”. Ignoring the fact that some of the people being deported had a legal right to be there that could have been proven if they were given their basic due process rights.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              there is no due process in actions not carried out by courts

              You’re talking about killing someone. Self-defence doesn’t ever happen without due process. You face a very high chance of being charged with murder, and then you plead “not guilty by reason of self-defence”. And present your evidence, hoping the jury believes it. That is what due process is.